# Fumane businesses: how many have a website, and how well it works Source: [Home](https://www.nfw.run/en)[State of the web](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web)[Veneto](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/region/veneto) // State of the web, October 2026 [v1.2.0](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/method/changelog#v1.2.0) We counted almost **130** Fumane businesses and checked their websites in October **2026**. Of these, **81** list a website, but almost one business in two has no working website. [Go to the data](#data) [How does my site rank](https://www.nfw.run/seo-audit) Open data - [Zenodo](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24055100 "DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24055100: full report in JSON and CSV") - [Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nfw-web-studio/state-of-the-web/tree/main/scans/fumane-city-october-2026-v1-2-0 "The files of this report on Hugging Face") - [Kaggle](https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/nfwwebstudio/state-of-the-web "The dataset on Kaggle, with every city") Loading the map Map generated from [Overture Maps](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/overture-maps) data of September **18**, **2026**. 114 businesses shown of 114 mapped in Fumane. Restaurants16Cafés2Bars and pubs30Food shops4Lodging19Travel2Fashion and beauty0Home and tech1Other shops3Automotive2Professional services1Legal0Finance2Real estate1Industry9Construction3Health1Dentists1Beauty and wellness5Sport and fitness5Pets0Education1Creative and media2Events and leisure4Local services0 // At a glance ## The numbers to remember - have a working website - 52% - of almost **130** businesses counted - The rest, **61**, have no website, or list one that does not open: an address that does not answer, a social profile. - to show the main content, on a phone - 8.2 s - median of **62** sites, mean **12.4 s** - More than three sites in four take longer than **4** seconds, the point Google calls poor. Past **3** seconds, **53%** of people on a phone leave the page. - describe themselves to Google in full (structured data) - 0% - of **67** businesses with a working website - Name, address, phone, website and opening hours in a block Google and AI assistants read without guessing. - have a valid sitemap - 64% - of **66** working sites - **36%** of sites do not hand Google the list of their pages, which it uses to find them all. - median AI Crawlability Score, out of 100 - 65 - across **66** working sites, mean **65.5** - How well **ChatGPT**, **Claude** or **Gemini** can read and cite the site; half the sites score above it, half below. For general searches, reviews and ratings count as much. - show Facebook, the most used way to get in touch - 73.8% - of the working sites measured for each way - Next: Phone **73.3%**, Email **73.3%**. Phone, email, contact form, messaging apps and social networks, each on its own. Review platforms are not counted. Shares only: each way has its own base. Want to know where your site sits among these numbers?[Run the free SEO audit](https://www.nfw.run/seo-audit) // The report in plain words ## What a customer finds when looking for a business in Fumane Here the numbers are told the way people using these sites experience them: a customer looking for a restaurant on their phone, a tourist checking a shop's opening hours, someone asking an AI assistant for a dentist nearby. [The detailed technical data is further down](#charts). Nearby cities 1. [1Marano di Valpolicella3 km southeast](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/marano-di-valpolicella-city) 1. [2Sant'Ambrogio di Valpolicella6 km southwest](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/sant-ambrogio-di-valpolicella-city) 1. [3Negrar di Valpolicella7 km southeast](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/negrar-di-valpolicella-city) 1. [4San Pietro in Cariano8 km south](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/san-pietro-in-cariano-city) 1. [5Caprino Veronese9 km northwest](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/caprino-veronese-city) See all 181 cities ### The Fumane economy online: businesses and their websites How many businesses there are, in which sectors, and how many have a website that actually opens. The **128** businesses we counted, by sector. The three largest: bars and pubs (**23.4%**), lodging (**14.8%**), and restaurants (**12.5%**). The count comes from [Overture Maps](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/overture-maps), an open dataset of places: these are the businesses a customer finds on a map, not the entries of the official business register. Business types in the area Share of the businesses counted - Bars and pubs**23.4%** (30) - Lodging**14.8%** (19) - Restaurants**12.5%** (16) - Industry**7.0%** (9) - Beauty and wellness**3.9%** (5) - Sport and fitness**3.9%** (5) - Events and leisure**3.1%** (4) - Food shops**3.1%** (4) - Construction**2.3%** (3) - Other shops**2.3%** (3) - Automotive**1.6%** (2) - Other sectors**21.9%** (28) Of **128** businesses, **81** (**63.3%**) list a website and **67** (**52.3%**) have one that works. The other **14** that list a website send customers to an address that does not answer, or to a social profile, a booking site or a delivery platform instead of a website. Someone tapping the link on a map gets an error, or a page that is not the business's own. The share of businesses with a working website is in line with the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Businesses with a website - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy Of the **14** businesses that list a website we could not open, **6** (**42.9%**) point to a domain or server that does not answer, **3** (**21.4%**) list a social profile or a platform page instead of a website, **3** (**21.4%**) open an error page, **1** (**7.1%**) has a site that answered "too many requests" (**429**) to our tool, and **1** (**7.1%**) fails to connect, on a network error or a timeout. A domain that does not answer has usually expired or lost its hosting; an error page is often the address of a site that was rebuilt or closed, left behind on the map. Among the profiles and platforms listed instead of a website, the most common is WhatsApp (**2**). The share of links to a domain that does not answer is lower than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Why the listed website does not open - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy Websites by sector - Working website, above average - Working website, below average - Listed, not working - No website - Fumane average, every sector: 52.3% - Working website, average of the cities in Italy Show the data | | businesses | Working website | Listed, not working | No website | Working website, average of the cities in Italy | | ------------- | ---------- | --------------- | ------------------- | ---------- | ----------------------------------------------- | | Bars and pubs | 30 | 66.7% | 0% | 33.3% | 25.7% | ### Speed and ease of use, on a phone How long someone opening the site on a phone waits, and whether they can use it with a screen reader too. What people do while they wait, according to research - 53% of people on a phone leave a page that takes longer than **3** seconds to load. - +103% more visitors leave straight away with a delay of just **2** seconds. - 7% fewer enquiries and sales for every extra **100** milliseconds of waiting. Sources: Google, Akamai. Research on user behavior, not measurements from this scan. On the main page of **62** sites, the median scores are **62** out of **100** for performance (mean **61.9**), **88** for accessibility (mean **85.3**), **96** for best practices (mean **87**), and **92** for SEO (mean **92.9**). Performance sits in the middle band (**50** to **89**): the page works, but on a phone with a slow mobile connection the wait is noticeable. Half the sites take more than **8.2** seconds to show their main content, the largest photo or block of text: above **4** seconds, the point where Google calls it poor. Accessibility needs work: many sites still have low contrast text, buttons without a name, or form fields a screen reader cannot read. The median performance score is lower than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Lighthouse scores of the home page - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy ### Being found on Google The basics that help Google find every page, show the right one, and read the business's details. Of **66** working sites, **36.4%** have no valid sitemap, **57.6%** show no Search Console verification we can see, **37.9%** have no meta description on the home page, and **28.8%** do not state a canonical URL for the home page. A sitemap is the list of pages a site hands to Google. Search Console is the free tool where the owner sees which searches the site appears for and whether Google finds errors. The meta description is the text under the title in search results: without one, Google picks its own. A canonical URL tells Google which version of a page to show when several copies exist. The share of sites without a sitemap is higher than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. What working sites are missing - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy **0** of **67** businesses with a working website (**0%**) have complete basic structured data: a LocalBusiness block and a WebSite block, both complete. Structured data is a block hidden in the page that tells Google the business's name, address, phone and opening hours without leaving it to guess. For the business's own details one block matters most, LocalBusiness: it tells Google the name, address, phone and opening hours without leaving it to guess. Of the **67** businesses with a working website, **11.9%** have one and only **0%** have it complete; those that have one most often leave out the address (**62.5%**). The share of businesses with complete data is lower than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Businesses with complete structured data (JSON-LD) - Yes, complete - No, incomplete or missing Show the data | | Fumane | Average of the cities in Italy | | ------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------ | | Yes, complete | 0% | 3.7% | | No, incomplete or missing | 100% | 96.3% | | Property | Block | Missing | Businesses | | ------------- | ------------- | ------- | ---------- | | Address | LocalBusiness | 62.5% | 5 of 8 | | Telephone | LocalBusiness | 62.5% | 5 of 8 | | URL | LocalBusiness | 37.5% | 3 of 8 | | Opening hours | LocalBusiness | 37.5% | 3 of 8 | ### Being read by AI assistants More and more people ask an AI assistant instead of searching Google. For general questions, such as a good restaurant downtown or a hairdresser open on Monday, assistants rely mostly on the ratings and the number of reviews a business has on Google and on review sites. The website becomes decisive for specific questions (the menu, prices, a particular service, holiday opening hours) and to confirm the business exists and is the right one: that is why the assistant has to be able to read it. **97.7%** of sites show their text without needing to run JavaScript, and **81.8%** let AI assistants' crawlers in. Across **66** working sites the AI Crawlability Score median is **64.8** out of **100** (mean **65.5**): half the sites score at least **64.8**, and the middle half sits between **54.6** and **84.9**. The score says how well an assistant such as **ChatGPT**, **Claude** or **Gemini** can read the site and tell what the business is: whether the text shows without running code, whether the site lets their crawlers in, whether there is structured data. The check with the lowest result is "ARD manifest for AI agents": only **0%** of sites pass it. The median score is lower than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Median AI Crawlability Score The score weighs ten checks: [here is which ones, and how much each counts](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/ai-crawlability-score). - 77.5/100 Average of the cities in Italy - 64.8/100 Fumane ### How the sites let people get in touch The four ways a visitor most often has to reach the business, as a share of the working sites measured. Each figure carries its own base, because the contact, form and channel checks do not cover exactly the same sites. - 38.3% - Have a contact form - 23 of 60 sites - 78.7% - Link at least one social network - 48 of 61 sites - 73.3% - Show a phone number - 44 of 60 sites - 73.3% - Show an email address 44 of 60 sites [All the contact figures: phones, emails, forms and channels](#contacts-detail) ### Trust: HTTPS and blocklisted servers Trust plays out on two fronts. The first is visible: **12.1%** of sites do not use HTTPS, and the browser writes "Not secure" next to the address, right where a customer is about to leave their name and phone number in a form. The second is invisible, and it is about email. A server flagged for spam does the website no harm, which opens and shows up in search results as before; but email sent from that server can land in customers' spam folders and never be read. We checked the server of every working site against three spam blocklists (Spamhaus, Barracuda and SpamCop). Of **63** sites with an answer, **0** (**0%**) sit on a blocklisted server: **0** servers out of **54**. No site sits on a blocklisted server: email sent from these servers is not at risk of landing in spam for this reason. The share of sites on a blocklisted server is lower than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Sites on spam blocklisted servers Fumane - Blocklisted0% - Not blocklisted95.5% - No answer4.5% 0 blocklisted servers out of 54 checked Average of the cities in Italy - Blocklisted1% - Not blocklisted98% - No answer1% 371 blocklisted servers out of 20,814 checked // Your site ### Try it on your site The free audit runs the same checks as this report on your site: it reads the pages, measures the home page with Lighthouse, computes the AI Crawlability Score and tells you how it compares with the sites of your city. No sign up, up to **4** sites an hour. - SEO - Speed - Core Web Vitals - AI Crawlability Score - Compared with your city [Run the free SEO audit](https://www.nfw.run/seo-audit) Source: NFW Web Studio scan of **128** businesses, data updated on October **21**, **2026**. // The technical detail ## The same measurements, by their technical names For developers: how the **66** working sites divide, not just their average. Here are the Core Web Vitals against Google's thresholds, JavaScript, image and font weight, file formats, technologies, what the structured data is made of, and the AI Crawlability Score's individual checks. Performance, across **62** sites: half score below **62**, one in four below **51**, one in ten above **83**. Median accessibility **88**, SEO **92**, AI Crawlability Score **64.8**. Each bar runs from the 10th to the 90th percentile; the thick part is the middle half of the sites, from the 25th to the 75th, and the mark is the median. A long bar means sites that differ a lot; a short one, sites that are alike. The median performance score is lower than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Lighthouse and AI Crawlability Scores: the spread Show the mean - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy - Mean Show the data | | | 10th percentile | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile | 90th percentile | Mean | | --------------------- | ------------------------------ | --------------- | --------------- | ------ | --------------- | --------------- | ---- | | Performance | Fumane | 44 | 51 | 62 | 73 | 83 | 62 | | Performance | Average of the cities in Italy | 41 | 54 | 66 | 76 | 89 | 65 | | Accessibility | Fumane | 71 | 82 | 88 | 91 | 96 | 85 | | Accessibility | Average of the cities in Italy | 73 | 81 | 88 | 93 | 96 | 86 | | Best practices | Fumane | 69 | 73 | 96 | 100 | 100 | 87 | | Best practices | Average of the cities in Italy | 69 | 77 | 96 | 100 | 100 | 87 | | SEO | Fumane | 85 | 92 | 92 | 100 | 100 | 93 | | SEO | Average of the cities in Italy | 83 | 91 | 92 | 100 | 100 | 92 | | AI Crawlability Score | Fumane | 34.3 | 54.6 | 64.8 | 84.9 | 87.3 | 65.5 | | AI Crawlability Score | Average of the cities in Italy | 38.7 | 59.3 | 77.5 | 85 | 94.6 | 69.5 | Medians across **62** sites: first content (FCP) **2.7 s**, main content (LCP) **8.2 s**, page on screen (Speed Index) **5.3 s**, blocking time (TBT) **244 ms**, and server response (TTFB) **207 ms**. Against Google's thresholds, the median is good for TTFB, in need of improvement for FCP, Speed Index, and TBT, and poor for LCP. These are lab measurements: Lighthouse simulates a mid-range phone on a slow mobile connection, so the times are longer than on an office computer. Interactivity (INP) cannot be measured in the lab. The median main content time (LCP) is higher than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Home page load times: Core Web Vitals and Lighthouse Show the mean - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy - Google's "good" threshold - Mean Show the data | | | 10th percentile | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile | 90th percentile | Mean | | ----------------------------- | ------------------------------ | --------------- | --------------- | ------ | --------------- | --------------- | ------ | | First content on screen (FCP) | Fumane | 1.6 s | 2.0 s | 2.7 s | 3.2 s | 4.3 s | 3.0 s | | First content on screen (FCP) | Average of the cities in Italy | 1.4 s | 2.0 s | 2.6 s | 3.4 s | 4.7 s | 3.0 s | | Main content on screen (LCP) | Fumane | 2.8 s | 5.0 s | 8.2 s | 14.5 s | 25.6 s | 12.4 s | | Main content on screen (LCP) | Average of the cities in Italy | 2.9 s | 4.5 s | 7.3 s | 12.8 s | 20.7 s | 10.6 s | | Page on screen (Speed Index) | Fumane | 2.2 s | 3.3 s | 5.3 s | 8.1 s | 11.2 s | 6.4 s | | Page on screen (Speed Index) | Average of the cities in Italy | 2.2 s | 3.2 s | 4.8 s | 7.4 s | 10.8 s | 6.0 s | | Blocking time (TBT) | Fumane | 1 ms | 65 ms | 244 ms | 479 ms | 718 ms | 359 ms | | Blocking time (TBT) | Average of the cities in Italy | 0 ms | 26 ms | 131 ms | 365 ms | 822 ms | 384 ms | | Server response (TTFB) | Fumane | 21 ms | 34 ms | 207 ms | 714 ms | 1.0 s | 586 ms | | Server response (TTFB) | Average of the cities in Italy | 14 ms | 29 ms | 96 ms | 492 ms | 1.2 s | 438 ms | JavaScript downloaded by the home page: median **946 kB**, one site in ten above **1.7 MB**. Layout shift (CLS): 75th percentile **0.00**, 90th percentile **0.23**. JavaScript has to be downloaded and run by the phone before the page responds to taps: the heavier it is, the harder the phone works. Three sites in four stay within **0.10**, Google's good threshold: content does not jump around while the page loads, but one site in ten goes above **0.23**. The median JavaScript weight is higher than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. JavaScript weight and layout stability Show the mean - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy - Mean Show the data | | | 10th percentile | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile | 90th percentile | Mean | | --------------------- | ------------------------------ | --------------- | --------------- | ------ | --------------- | --------------- | ------ | | JavaScript downloaded | Fumane | 64 kB | 440 kB | 946 kB | 1.3 MB | 1.7 MB | 932 kB | | JavaScript downloaded | Average of the cities in Italy | 110 kB | 317 kB | 678 kB | 1.2 MB | 1.9 MB | 871 kB | - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy - Google's "good" threshold - Mean Show the data | | | 10th percentile | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile | 90th percentile | Mean | | ------------------ | ------------------------------ | --------------- | --------------- | ------ | --------------- | --------------- | ---- | | Layout shift (CLS) | Fumane | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.08 | | Layout shift (CLS) | Average of the cities in Italy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.05 | Median weight per file: images **36 kB**, fonts **26 kB**, preview image (og:image) **143 kB**. One image in ten is above **419 kB**. A photo of a few hundred kB makes sense full screen, not as a thumbnail: the heaviest files are what slow a page down on a phone. The scale is logarithmic: each tick is ten times the one before. The median image weight is higher than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. File weight, by kind Show the mean - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy - Mean Show the data | | | 10th percentile | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile | 90th percentile | Mean | | ------------------------ | ------------------------------ | --------------- | --------------- | ------ | --------------- | --------------- | ------- | | Images | Fumane | 334 B | 3 kB | 36 kB | 165 kB | 419 kB | 186 kB | | Images | Average of the cities in Italy | 553 B | 3 kB | 24 kB | 102 kB | 297 kB | 135 kB | | Fonts | Fumane | 14 kB | 18 kB | 26 kB | 43 kB | 78 kB | 39 kB | | Fonts | Average of the cities in Italy | 9 kB | 17 kB | 32 kB | 49 kB | 85 kB | 48 kB | | Favicons | Fumane | 934 B | 2 kB | 6 kB | 14 kB | 34 kB | 14 kB | | Favicons | Average of the cities in Italy | 830 B | 1 kB | 4 kB | 11 kB | 23 kB | 14 kB | | Preview image (og:image) | Fumane | 23 kB | 41 kB | 143 kB | 333 kB | 801 kB | 286 kB | | Preview image (og:image) | Average of the cities in Italy | 16 kB | 45 kB | 114 kB | 283 kB | 678 kB | 318 kB | | Videos | Fumane | 1.3 MB | 1.7 MB | 2.5 MB | 6.0 MB | 22.8 MB | 10.3 MB | | Videos | Average of the cities in Italy | 40 kB | 1.1 MB | 5.0 MB | 15.3 MB | 38.0 MB | 14.7 MB | Of the **1,873** images found, **17.9%** use a modern format (WebP or AVIF), **44.7%** JPG and **22.8%** PNG. Of the fonts, **85.8%** are WOFF2. At the same quality, WebP and AVIF are usually much lighter than JPG and PNG: the same photo reaches the phone sooner and uses less data. The share of images in a modern format is lower than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. File formats Images - JPG - PNG - WEBP - SVG - Other Show the data | | Fumane | Average of the cities in Italy | | ----- | ------ | ------------------------------ | | JPG | 44.7% | 39.5% | | PNG | 22.8% | 22.3% | | WEBP | 11.9% | 16.7% | | SVG | 7.5% | 11.9% | | Other | 13.1% | 9.5% | Fonts - WOFF2 - WOFF - TTF - OTF - Other Show the data | | Fumane | Average of the cities in Italy | | ----- | ------ | ------------------------------ | | WOFF2 | 85.8% | 84% | | WOFF | 7% | 9.3% | | TTF | 6% | 5.7% | | OTF | 1.3% | 0.7% | | Other | 0% | 0.4% | Favicons - PNG - ICO - JPG - WEBP - Other Show the data | | Fumane | Average of the cities in Italy | | ----- | ------ | ------------------------------ | | PNG | 65.1% | 65% | | ICO | 14.2% | 15.4% | | JPG | 12.3% | 12.8% | | WEBP | 6.6% | 3.6% | | Other | 1.9% | 3.3% | Preview image (og:image) - JPG - PNG - WEBP - GIF - Other Show the data | | Fumane | Average of the cities in Italy | | ----- | ------ | ------------------------------ | | JPG | 62.4% | 64.9% | | PNG | 21.8% | 22.6% | | WEBP | 10.9% | 11% | | GIF | 3% | 0.3% | | Other | 2% | 1.3% | Videos - MP4 - Other Show the data | | Fumane | Average of the cities in Italy | | ----- | ------ | ------------------------------ | | MP4 | 100% | 88.2% | | Other | 0% | 11.8% | Across **63** working sites we recognized **189** different technologies. The most common: PHP (**56.1%**), jQuery (**56.1%**), and Google Analytics (**45.5%**). The most used CMS is WordPress, on **39.4%** of sites. Technologies are recognized with Wappalyzer on the main page only, after its JavaScript has run: a technology used only on inner pages can be missed. The filter above shows one category at a time. The share of sites on WordPress is in line with the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Most used technologies AllJavaScript librariesProgramming languagesCMSAnalyticsBlogsWeb serversFont scriptsCookie complianceJavaScript frameworksWordPress plugins - Fumane - Average of the cities in Italy 1. 01 PHPProgramming languages 56.1% 1. 02 jQueryJavaScript libraries 56.1% 1. 03 Open Graph 47% 1. 04 Google AnalyticsAnalytics 45.5% 1. 05 Google Tag ManagerTag managers 42.4% 1. 06 MySQLDatabases 40.9% 1. 07 HTTP/3 39.4% 1. 08 WordPressBlogs 39.4% 1. 09 jQuery MigrateJavaScript libraries 36.4% 1. 10 Google Font APIFont scripts 28.8% 1. 11 core-jsJavaScript libraries 24.2% 1. 12 Apache HTTP ServerWeb servers 22.7% Show the data | | Fumane | Average of the cities in Italy | | ------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------ | | PHP | 56.1% | 51.2% | | jQuery | 56.1% | 64.1% | | Open Graph | 47% | 58% | | Google Analytics | 45.5% | 41.5% | | Google Tag Manager | 42.4% | 43.9% | | MySQL | 40.9% | 42.7% | | HTTP/3 | 39.4% | 40.6% | | WordPress | 39.4% | 41.4% | | jQuery Migrate | 36.4% | 39.1% | | Google Font API | 28.8% | 45.5% | | core-js | 24.2% | 33.1% | | Apache HTTP Server | 22.7% | 17% | | Font Awesome | 22.7% | 38% | | RSS | 22.7% | 36.1% | | Priority Hints | 21.2% | 36.9% | | Swiper | 21.2% | 19.2% | | Bootstrap | 19.7% | 21.9% | | Nginx | 19.7% | 24.1% | | Aruba.it | 18.2% | 12.5% | | Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) | 16.7% | 20.2% | | iubenda | 16.7% | 15.6% | | GSAP | 15.2% | 14.6% | | Google Maps | 15.2% | 10.5% | | Yoast SEO | 15.2% | 20.3% | | reCAPTCHA | 15.2% | 13.5% | | Slider Revolution | 13.6% | 9.1% | | Cloudflare | 12.1% | 19.7% | | Contact Form 7 | 12.1% | 16.9% | | Elementor | 12.1% | 13.6% | | React | 12.1% | 10.2% | | WPML | 12.1% | 4.9% | | jQuery UI | 12.1% | 23.4% | | Lodash | 10.6% | 9.7% | | Masonry | 10.6% | 13.5% | | Modernizr | 10.6% | 9.7% | | Site Kit | 10.6% | 6.7% | | Plesk | 9.1% | 7.3% | | Sentry | 9.1% | 5% | | Wix | 9.1% | 3.4% | | CookieYes | 7.6% | 4.8% | | Isotope | 7.6% | 10.6% | | Onsen UI | 7.6% | n/a | | PWA | 7.6% | 7.5% | | Store Vantage | 7.6% | n/a | | lit-element | 7.6% | 8% | | lit-html | 7.6% | 8.1% | | wpBakery | 7.6% | 6.3% | | Cart Functionality | 6.1% | 11.9% | | Facebook Pixel | 6.1% | 10.8% | | OWL Carousel | 6.1% | 6.8% | | RankMath SEO | 6.1% | 3.7% | | jsDelivr | 6.1% | 4.8% | | Adobe Fonts | 4.5% | 2.3% | | Amazon Web Services | 4.5% | 5.7% | | Cloudflare Bot Management | 4.5% | 2.7% | | FancyBox | 4.5% | 5.4% | | Hello Elementor | 4.5% | 4.5% | | LazySizes | 4.5% | 6.2% | | Polylang | 4.5% | n/a | | Squarespace | 4.5% | n/a | | Tailwind CSS | 4.5% | 4.6% | | Vimeo | 4.5% | 2.6% | | prettyPhoto | 4.5% | 3.8% | | Amazon S3 | 3% | n/a | | Closure Library | 3% | n/a | | CodeIgniter | 3% | n/a | | Cookie Control | 3% | 6.2% | | CookieBAR | 3% | n/a | | Cookiebot | 3% | 6.6% | | Cybot | 3% | 5.2% | | Facebook Login | 3% | 3% | | Flickity | 3% | 2.4% | | Google AdSense | 3% | n/a | | Google Cloud | 3% | n/a | | Google Cloud CDN | 3% | n/a | | Google Hosted Libraries | 3% | 3.1% | | Ionicons | 3% | n/a | | Java | 3% | n/a | | Joomla | 3% | n/a | | Lenis | 3% | n/a | | Marked | 3% | n/a | | MediaElement.js | 3% | 4.3% | | Moment.js | 3% | 3.2% | | OceanWP | 3% | n/a | | OpenResty | 3% | n/a | | Popper | 3% | 4% | | RequireJS | 3% | 2.2% | | ShareThis | 3% | n/a | | Squarespace Commerce | 3% | n/a | | Stripe | 3% | n/a | | Svelte | 3% | n/a | | SvelteKit | 3% | n/a | | Swup | 3% | n/a | | Vite | 3% | n/a | | WPForms | 3% | n/a | | Weglot | 3% | n/a | | WooCommerce | 3% | 6.1% | | YUI | 3% | n/a | | YouTube | 3% | 3.8% | | jQuery Mobile | 3% | n/a | Of the **67** businesses with a working website, **50.7%** have at least one JSON-LD block, but only **0%** have complete basic data. The most common types on the sites are WebSite (**42.4%**), WebPage (**33.3%**), and Organization (**30.3%**). WebSite, WebPage and BreadcrumbList describe the site and its pages, and an SEO plugin often adds them on its own. To tell Google and AI assistants who the business is, where it is and when it is open, it takes a complete LocalBusiness block. The share of businesses with complete basic data is lower than the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. Basic structured data (JSON-LD) ### What we count as complete A business has complete basic structured data when the pages of its site carry both of these JSON-LD blocks: - `LocalBusiness` or one of its subtypes (Restaurant, Dentist, Store, LegalService...), with name, a structured address (PostalAddress, not free text), telephone, URL and opening hours. - `WebSite` with the site's name and URL. Each block can appear on any of the analyzed pages. A block missing even one of these counts as incomplete. Shares are of the businesses with a working website. Fumane 50.7% 49.3% - Complete **0%** - Some JSON-LD, basics incomplete **50.7%** - No JSON-LD **49.3%** Average of the cities in Italy 55.8% 40.5% - Complete **3.7%** - Some JSON-LD, basics incomplete **55.8%** - No JSON-LD **40.5%** `LocalBusiness`Complete **0%** - Complete **0%** - Incomplete **11.9%** - Missing **88.1%** Missing from LocalBusiness - Address**62.5%** - Telephone**62.5%** - URL**37.5%** - Opening hours**37.5%** - Name**0%** `WebSite`Complete **43.3%** - Complete **43.3%** - Incomplete **0%** - Missing **56.7%** Missing from WebSite - Name**0%** - URL**0%** Across **66** working sites, the check with the highest result is "Content visible without JavaScript" (**97.7**), the one with the lowest "ARD manifest for AI agents" (**0**). The robots.txt lets AI crawlers in on **81.8%** of sites. Each check has a weight, written under its name: a site's score is the weighted average of the checks that could be verified. A check the scan could not verify does not count as failed, and the site is judged on the others. The share of sites open to AI crawlers is in line with the average of the cities in Italy we have scanned so far. The AI Crawlability Score's checks - 97.7% Content visible without JavaScript weight 20 Average of the cities in Italy: **94.4%** - 81.8% robots.txt open to AI crawlers weight 15 Average of the cities in Italy: **83.4%** - 45.5% Structured data on the home page weight 15 Average of the cities in Italy: **56.6%** - 63.6% Sitemap weight 10 Average of the cities in Italy: **77.3%** - 18.2% llms.txt file weight 10 Average of the cities in Italy: **24.5%** - 92.9% Lighthouse SEO score weight 5 Average of the cities in Italy: **91.8%** - 90.9% Home page title weight 5 Average of the cities in Italy: **93.4%** - 87.9% HTTPS weight 5 Average of the cities in Italy: **89%** - 71.2% Home page canonical weight 5 Average of the cities in Italy: **73.2%** - 62.1% Home page meta description weight 5 Average of the cities in Italy: **66.3%** - 0% ARD manifest for AI agents weight 5 Average of the cities in Italy: **0%** // Digging deeper ## What else the working sites show Cuts of the 66 working sites beyond the headline figures. A site counts once, only home pages are measured, and a group needs at least 10 sites to appear. ### Sector by sector Mean Lighthouse performance and AI Crawlability Score of the working sites of each sector with at least 10 sites. A site counts once, in the sector most of its businesses are in. | Sector | Sites | Performance | AI Crawlability Score | | ------------- | ----- | ----------- | --------------------- | | Bars and pubs | 20 | 59.2 | 73.3 | | Lodging | 10 | 51.8 | 66.4 | ### What the sites run on Technologies detected on the home page of 63 of 66 working sites, with the mean scores of the sites that use each. | Technology | Sites | Share | Performance | AI Crawlability Score | | ------------------ | ----- | ----- | ----------- | --------------------- | | jQuery | 37 | 56.1% | 60.1 | 70.5 | | PHP | 37 | 56.1% | 59.4 | 71.1 | | Open Graph | 31 | 47% | 57.5 | 73.4 | | Google Analytics | 30 | 45.5% | 55.1 | 72.6 | | Google Tag Manager | 28 | 42.4% | 57.2 | 72.4 | | MySQL | 27 | 40.9% | 59.2 | 76.4 | | HTTP/3 | 26 | 39.4% | 64.6 | 69.9 | | WordPress | 26 | 39.4% | 58.8 | 77.3 | | CDN | Sites | Share | Performance | AI Crawlability Score | | ------------- | ----- | ----- | ----------- | --------------------- | | None detected | 46 | 69.7% | 61.5 | 63.9 | ### Cookies and analytics 31.8% of the sites show a cookie consent platform, and 54.5% run an analytics tool. Of those that run analytics, 55.6% show no consent platform we could detect. Most common: Iubenda (18.2%). Detected from what the home page loads: a site may use a tool we do not see, so read these as a floor. ### Content basics 51.5% of the sites have at least one page that repeats a word above the density our crawler flags as keyword stuffing. On the home page, 19.7% of titles are longer than 60 characters and 37.9% of the sites have no meta description. 16.7% repeat the same title on more than one page. ### Security 87.9% of the sites answer on HTTPS, and 89.7% of those redirect plain HTTP to it. Of 57 certificates checked, 100% are valid and 26.3% expire within 30 days. Security headers on the home page: 19.7% send Strict-Transport-Security and 6.1% a Content-Security-Policy. We check that a header is present, not how strong it is. // Contacts, forms and channels ## How the working sites let people get in touch What a visitor can use to reach the business: phone, email, forms and the messaging, social and review channels. Each part states its base once, and every figure is written next to its bar. "Shown" means on screen or inside a collapsed menu, not that it exists somewhere in the code. The counts cover every page we audited on a site, up to 5, not only the home page. The desktop and mobile shares are small and comparable only within one scan. We never publish or keep a phone number, an email address or a profile name from this data. ### How a visitor can reach the business Of 60 sites measured. "Desktop only" means shown on desktop and missing on mobile, "mobile only" the reverse, of the sites that have that contact. - 73.3% - Show a phone number - 44 sites - desktop only 4.5%mobile only 4.5% - 73.3% - Show an email address - 44 sites - desktop only 0%mobile only 0% - 68.3% - Link a contact page 16.7% - Show no contact at all #### The phone number, in detail Shares of the sites that show a phone number. The types overlap: a site can show a mobile and a landline. - 40.9%Tappable to call on mobile - 52.3%Shown as plain text, without a call link - 65.9%Not above the fold on mobile - 54.5%Mobile numbers - 63.6%Landlines - 4.5%Toll free numbers #### The email address, in detail Shares of the sites that show an email address. - 68.2%Address on the business's own domain - 13.6%Only a free mailbox (Gmail and similar) - 9.1%A certified email (PEC) address - 5.3%Domain with no mail server (no MX record)of 38 domains checked #### Contacts in the business listing and in structured data Of the sites whose listing (Overture Maps) has that contact, the share that also shows it on the site. - 60%Phone from the listing, shown on the siteof 60 sites - 62%Email from the listing, shown on the siteof 50 sites - 1.8%Social profiles from the listing, all linkedof 55 sites - 0%Declared in structured data but not shown on the pageof the sites measured ### Forms on the sites Of 60 sites measured. We look at the forms and never submit them: the destination of each gets one plain request, nothing is sent. - 38.3% - Have a contact form - 23 sites - desktop only 0%mobile only 4.3% - 20% - Have a newsletter form 18.3% - Have a search form 3.3% - Have a login form #### What the contact forms are built with Shares of the sites with a contact form. - Custom or not recognised16 sites69.6% - Contact Form 73 sites13% - Elementor Forms3 sites13% - WPForms2 sites8.7% - Divi1 sites4.3% - Fluent Forms1 sites4.3% #### How the contact forms are made Shares of the sites with a contact form. - 39.1%With a captcha - 60.9%With no privacy consent checkbox or notice - 4.3%Sending the data to another domain - 0%Opening the visitor's mail app instead of sending (mailto) - 4.3%Sending over plain HTTP - 60.9%With fields that have no label - 65.2%With fields of the wrong input type - 20%Whose destination does not answerof 10 sites probed ### Messaging, social and review channels Of 61 sites checked. - 78.7% - Show at least one: social networks - 48 sites - desktop only 2.1%mobile only 0% - 16.4% - Show at least one: messaging apps - 10 sites - desktop only 0%mobile only 10% - 21.3% - Show at least one: review and booking platforms - 13 sites - desktop only 6.7%mobile only 20% - 19.7% - Show no channel at all 12 sites #### Channel by channel "Desktop only" and "mobile only" are shares of the sites measured on both renders. - FacebookSocial networksdesktop only 2.3%mobile only 0%73.8% - InstagramSocial networksdesktop only 0%mobile only 0%62.3% - YouTubeSocial networksdesktop only 0%mobile only 0%27.9% - WhatsAppMessaging appsdesktop only 0%mobile only 10%16.4% - Google Business ProfileReview and booking platformsdesktop only 8.3%mobile only 25%16.4% - XSocial networksdesktop only 0%mobile only 0%13.1% - LinkedInSocial networksdesktop only 0%mobile only 0%9.8% - TripadvisorReview and booking platformsdesktop only 0%mobile only 0%4.9% - TelegramMessaging appsdesktop only 0%mobile only 0%1.6% - TikTokSocial networksdesktop only 0%mobile only 0%1.6% - VimeoSocial networksdesktop only 0%mobile only 0%1.6% #### Links to call and write A site shows 2.3 channels on average. - 31.1%Sites with a tap to call link - 49.2%Sites with a mailto link // This scan ## The Fumane scan, at a glance - Period From October **16** to **21**, **2026** - Kind of scan Quick: home page and first **4** sitemap pages; Lighthouse and technologies on the home page only - Area City of Fumane - Businesses counted **128** - Working sites analyzed **66** - National comparison Average of the cities scanned in Italy - Data updated October **21**, **2026** - Overture Maps data September **18**, **2026** - Scanner version [v1.2.0](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/method/changelog#v1.2.0) - Editions of this report - [November 2026, v1.2.1](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/fumane-city) - October 2026, v1.2.0: this page [How we measure: the full method](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/method) // Data and limits ## Where the data comes from The businesses and the website they list come from [Overture Maps](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/overture-maps), an open dataset of places. We use no other source to find websites: every site analyzed is the one listed on the business's Overture entry. Places have no single licence for the whole theme: each provider has its own, all permissive. CDLA Permissive **2.0** for Meta, Microsoft, PinMeTo, Krick, RenderSEO, DAC and BrightQuery, Apache **2.0** for Foursquare (whose data was transformed to Overture's schema) and CC0 **1.0** for AllThePlaces. Administrative boundaries (the divisions theme) are licensed ODbL and come from OpenStreetMap, geoBoundaries, Esri Community Maps and LINZ. That is why our reports carry the line Overture gives for data that includes OpenStreetMap. Overture's page states no sharing or derived data obligations beyond that line: we add no conditions that are not there, and refer to each source's own licence for the details. Attribution\ © OpenStreetMap contributors, [Overture Maps](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/overture-maps) Foundation ### What this scan read - [Overture](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/overture-maps) dataset of September **18**, **2026**. - **14** of the **80** sites we tried to analyze did not answer or blocked our tool (**17.5%**): the web figures cover the other **66**. - AI Crawlability Score computed with [rules 2.0.0](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/ai-crawlability-score/changelog#v2.0.0). It is our own measure, not an industry standard. - The full report is archived on Zenodo ([DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24055100](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24055100)) on November **8**, **2026**, in JSON and CSV. ### What these figures do and do not measure A report says precise things, and only those. These are the limits to keep in mind when quoting one of its figures. - Homepage only. Lighthouse and the AI Crawlability Score measure each site's main page, not the whole site: the figure is that of a shop window, not of every page. - Working sites only. The web figures cover the sites that answer. Sites that do not answer, or that block our tool, are left out: a site behind a bot check can be unmeasurable while working for a visitor. - Only businesses that list a website on Overture. A business with no website on its listing is not measured on the web, and a listing with an old website leads to a page that does not open. Every report says how many businesses list a website and how many have a working one. - A sample, not a register. Overture is not the business register: it covers some businesses and some areas better than others, so the picture can lean towards businesses with a well kept listing. - A site counts once. When several businesses list the same site, it counts once in the web figures. Business counts count each one. - One language. Our tool presents itself as an Italian browser: a multilingual site is measured in its Italian version. - Search Console is recognised only from a meta tag or the DNS, so the real share can be higher than the one we show. - The AI Crawlability Score is our own measure, not a market standard: it cannot be compared with outside tools. It changes with rules versions, and two reports compare only on the same scanner and the same rules. - Cities only, and only averages and medians. Reports do not say who is best in a sector or which studios do better, and they publish no single business's result. [How a business gets its category](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/method#categories) [What Overture Maps is, and why we use it](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/overture-maps) // After the report ## If your website is in these numbers We are NFW Web Studio, a web studio based in Verona, working with businesses and professionals in Fumane and across Italy and Europe. If your site is one of the slow ones on a phone, has no sitemap, or does not describe the business in a way Google can read, that can be fixed: a landing page starts from **€650** and a full website from **€1,450**, VAT included. [Web design services for businesses](https://www.nfw.run/website-design) ### [Website redesign services](https://www.nfw.run/website-redesign) [We rebuild your site from what you already have, and fix what this report measures: speed on a phone, sitemap, business details for Google and AI assistants. From **€400** for a landing page.](https://www.nfw.run/website-redesign) [Learn more](https://www.nfw.run/website-redesign) ### [SEO services for businesses](https://www.nfw.run/seo-services) [Search Console, sitemap, canonical URLs and a LocalBusiness block: the items in this report that decide whether Google finds you. From **€400** one time, or **€550** a month for ongoing SEO.](https://www.nfw.run/seo-services) [Learn more](https://www.nfw.run/seo-services) ### [Case: Ricerca Perdite 1972](https://www.nfw.run/case-studies/ricerca-perdite-1972) [It started as a landing page and grew into a full website with a page for every town: from 6 to 40 Google clicks in 42 days, and the first call from the Business Profile in month three.](https://www.nfw.run/case-studies/ricerca-perdite-1972) [Read the case](https://www.nfw.run/case-studies/ricerca-perdite-1972) [How much does a website cost: all prices](https://www.nfw.run/pricing) // frequently asked questions ## The answers, to your questions. ### How many Fumane businesses have a website? We counted **128** businesses in Fumane. **81** of them (**63.3%**) list a website, but only **67** (**52.3%**) have one that works: the other addresses do not answer, or lead to a social profile or a booking site. The scan ran from October **16** to **21**, **2026**. ### Which sectors in Fumane are most often without a website? The Fumane scan does not have enough businesses yet to compare sectors. ### Is my business among the ones you scanned? Can I see its result? If it is based in Fumane and appears on [Overture Maps](https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/overture-maps), probably yes. We do not publish results for single businesses or single sites, here or in the open data. If you want to see yours, book the free **30** minute call: we show you how it came out of the scan, meaning speed, SEO, AI readability and technologies, and what we would fix first. Or run the [free SEO audit](https://www.nfw.run/seo-audit) on your site right away: the same checks as this report, compared with the sites of your city. ### What should I fix first on my website? The things this report finds missing most often are also the cheapest to fix: connecting Search Console, writing a meta description for the home page, having a valid sitemap, adding a complete LocalBusiness block with opening hours, converting images to WebP or AVIF, and adding a preview image for shares. For general searches, ratings and reviews matter most: keeping the Google listing up to date is worth as much as the website. The [free SEO audit](https://www.nfw.run/seo-audit) shows you in a few minutes which of these your site is missing; on the free call we go through them together. ### How do I cite this report? The figures are free to use, commercial use included, as long as you cite the source (CC BY **4.0** license). Cite NFW Web Studio, the page title and its link and the DOI, for example: NFW Web Studio, "Fumane businesses, October **2026**", https\://www\.nfw\.run/state-of-the-web/fumane-city-october-2026-v1-2-0, doi:10.5281/zenodo.24055100. The full report is archived on Zenodo, in JSON and CSV: https\://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24055100. The figures of this edition are final and no longer change. The aggregate figures are also available as JSON at https\://dashboard.nfw\.run/state-of-the-web/v1/scans/4e8c404c-90b5-40ed-a98e-1485d5bd6ce0. If you need a figure that is not here, write to us. ### What are your prices and delivery times? A landing page starts from **€650** and a full website from **€1,450**, VAT included. These are starting prices: after a call, you get a written quote with a single figure within **24** hours. A landing page takes under **7** days, a full website starts from **7** days. With the express option, timelines are halved and guaranteed: online within **48** hours for a landing page and **96** hours for a full website. ### Can we meet in person? Do you work outside Fumane? Yes to both. We are based in Verona, and when it makes sense we come and see the shop, workshop or venue: understanding the space helps us describe it on the site. We also work remotely with businesses across Italy and Europe, with the same method and timelines: only the way we meet changes, a video call instead of a coffee. ### Can I build a free website myself? You can, and to get started it may be enough. Before you choose, check the things this report measures on every site: how long it takes to open on a phone, whether it has a sitemap, whether it describes the business in a way Google and AI assistants can read. Some free builders cover them, some do not, and some do not let you change them. To check them you can use the [free SEO audit](https://www.nfw.run/seo-audit); if you like, we can look at what you built together on the free call. Didn't find what you were looking for? [Contact us](https://www.nfw.run/contact-us) // ready when you are ## Your website, online within a week. Write to us today: we reply within **24** hours with the next steps. - Meet in person or by video call - Written quote within **24** hours - Published prices, VAT included - Online within a week - The site stays yours Contact for Fumane Enrico: Software Engineer Available for in-person meetings in San Giovanni Lupatoto and Verona, and by video call across Italy and Europe. [Write to us](mailto:info@nfw.run) [Book a call](https://calendly.com/nfw-info/30min)