NFW Web Studio
News
SEO audit

SEO audit of supportfast.ai

Some firewalls and bot protections (Cloudflare, Vercel and the like) block automated scans: if the results look odd or partial, that is almost always why.

Homepage scores

55
Performance
85
SEO
82
Accessibility
77
Best practices
84
AI score

Lighthouse measures the homepage by simulating a mid range phone on a slow mobile connection.

How the Performance score is built
Lighthouse weighs five measures: each bar is the measure's own score out of 100, the weight says how much it counts in the total. That is why a faster LCP can still end in a lower score, if the blocking time grows.
  • First Contentful Paintweight 101.1 s | 99/100 | no points lost
  • Speed Indexweight 103.0 s | 94/100 | 1 point lost
  • Largest Contentful Paintweight 2516.2 s | 0/100 | 25 points lost
  • Total Blocking Timeweight 30781 ms | 38/100 | 19 points lost
  • Layout stability (CLS)weight 250.00 | 100/100 | no points lost

Lighthouse's 9 runs

  1. 52
    Run 1
  2. 43
    Run 2
  3. 43
    Run 3
  4. 61
    Run 4
  5. 58
    Run 5
  6. 57
    Run 6
  7. 55
    Run 7
  8. 55
    Run 8
  9. 54
    Run 9

Lighthouse measures the homepage several times in a row and the report shows the average: runs always land a few points apart, because of the network and the server's load.

Lighthouse's total is 55 out of 100, the average of the single runs' scores: the parts, computed on the average times, can be off it by a few points.

// fix first

The fixes that matter most

  1. 1
    Performance

    The homepage's main content shows up late: Largest Contentful Paint 16.2 s, while Google counts it as good within 2.5 s. Lighten what loads first: images, fonts and JavaScript.

    Lighthouse score 55 out of 100: 90 and up is good.

  2. 2
    Accessibility

    Parts of the homepage are hard to use with a screen reader, a keyboard or low vision: usually color contrast, image alt text, labels on buttons and links, or the order of the headings.

    Lighthouse score 82 out of 100: 90 and up is good.

  3. 3
    SEO

    Lighthouse finds SEO problems on the homepage that the checks below do not cover: usually links without text saying where they lead, pages kept out of the index or elements too small to tap on a phone.

    Lighthouse score 85 out of 100: 90 and up is good.

// checks

What we checked

Domain and server

  • HTTPS

    The site is served over HTTPS.

  • HTTP to HTTPS

    The HTTP version sends visitors to HTTPS with a permanent redirect.

  • www and no www

    The www and bare versions do not lead to the same address.

  • robots.txt

    The robots.txt file exists.

  • robots.txt and AI

    The robots.txt lets AI crawlers read the site.

  • Sitemap

    The XML sitemap exists.

  • llms.txt

    The llms.txt file is missing.

  • ARD manifest

    The site publishes no ARD (Agentic Resource Discovery) manifest, the list of the resources it offers to AI agents.

  • Google Search Console

    The site is verified on Google Search Console.

  • Spam blocklists

    The server's IP is not on the spam blocklists we check.

Homepage

  • Title

    The homepage has a title.

  • Meta description

    The homepage has a meta description.

  • Canonical

    The homepage declares its canonical address.

  • Structured data (JSON LD)

    The homepage has structured data.

  • Social preview (Open Graph)

    The homepage has Open Graph tags.

  • Headings in the text

    The homepage has headings (H1, H2...) in its text.

  • Homepage response

    The homepage answers without errors.

  • Empty page (soft 404)

    The homepage is not an empty page.

  • Content without JavaScript

    The homepage's content can be read without JavaScript.

// comparison

How does your site compare with the rest?

Compare the site with the businesses we scanned in a city or across the country, with another audit of the same site, or with another site.

Loading the cities' data

Audit this site againScan another site
// frequently asked questions

SEO, email, speed and AI:
the short answers.

An SEO audit checks everything that can hold a site back in search results. Our analyzer reads the site's homepage and checks its title, meta description, canonical, structured data, social preview, headings, errors, robots.txt, the sitemap, llms.txt, HTTPS and redirects, then measures it with Lighthouse.
Yes, with no sign up and no card. You can scan up to 5 different websites an hour, and audit the same site again after 10 minutes: before that we show you the audit already made. Every audit keeps its own page, so you can compare them over time.
Usually a few minutes. Public scans start in order of arrival and give way to the studio's own work, so while you wait you see your place in line and an estimated time that updates on its own. You can also close the page and get the report by email.
Lighthouse scores SEO from 0 to 100: 90 and above is good, 50 to 89 needs improvement, below 50 is poor. It is a technical check, not a ranking prediction: a site can score 100 and stay invisible if its content does not answer what people are searching for.
They are lab measurements: Lighthouse loads the homepage as a mid range phone on a slow mobile network. By Google's measure, Largest Contentful Paint is good within 2.5 seconds and layout stability (CLS) within 0.1. Interactivity (INP) can only be measured on real users, so it is not shown.
It measures how ready the site is to be read and cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google's AI answers. It is a weighted mean of eleven checks: content readable without JavaScript, llms.txt, robots.txt open to AI crawlers, structured data, sitemap, title, meta description, canonical, HTTPS, SEO score and the ARD (Agentic Resource Discovery) manifest. A check we cannot verify never lowers the score.
Yes, on the technical side. Generative engine optimization (GEO), or AI search optimization, is SEO for AI answers: before an assistant can cite a site, it has to be able to read it. The AI score checks exactly that, through llms.txt, AI crawlers and structured data. Being cited then depends on content, which the audit does not judge.
With the business websites of a city we scanned for the State of the Web, or with the national average. For every measure we tell you how many of those sites yours does better than, and what the median value is. You pick the city to compare with.
Almost always because of a firewall or bot protection, such as Cloudflare's or Vercel's: it blocks automated visits, so the scan reads a checkpoint page instead of the site. When we notice it we show no scores. If the site is yours you can let the scanner through, or write to us and we will look at it.
Yes. Every audit has its own public page, and for each site the latest successful audit can appear on Google. Write to audits@nfw.run from an address on the domain, or tell us how to check the site is yours: we remove its audits and, if you like, make sure it is not scanned again.
The email is optional: we only use it if you accept both the privacy policy and marketing communications, and we send you the report. You can unsubscribe from every email. Every audit has its own page; your browser keeps only a reference to your latest audits, to reopen them.

The report says something's off.
We can fix it.

SEO errors, slow pages, sites invisible to AI: these are exactly the problems we solve for small and medium businesses every day.

Let's talk about your siteRead the case studies