NFW Web Studio
News
// State of the web, October 2026
v1.2.0

Sedico businesses: how many have a website, and how well it works

We counted just over 300 Sedico businesses and checked their websites in October 2026. Of these, almost 200 list a website, but more than one business in two has no working website.

284 businesses shown of 284 mapped in Sedico
Map generated from Overture Maps data of September 18, 2026.
// At a glance

The numbers to remember

have a working website
46%
of just over 300 businesses counted
The rest, just over 170, have no website, or list one that does not open: an address that does not answer, a social profile.
to show the main content, on a phone
9.2 s
median of just over 130 sites, mean 12.1 s
More than three sites in four take longer than 4 seconds, the point Google calls poor. Past 3 seconds, 53% of people on a phone leave the page.
describe themselves to Google in full (structured data)
3%
of 150 businesses with a working website
Name, address, phone, website and opening hours in a block Google and AI assistants read without guessing.
have a valid sitemap
81%
of just over 140 working sites
19% of sites do not hand Google the list of their pages, which it uses to find them all.
median AI Crawlability Score, out of 100
80
across just over 140 working sites, mean 71.1
How well ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini can read and cite the site; half the sites score above it, half below. For general searches, reviews and ratings count as much.

Want to know where your site sits among these numbers?Run the free SEO audit

// The report in plain words

What a customer finds when looking for a business in Sedico

Here the numbers are told the way people using these sites experience them: a customer looking for a restaurant on their phone, a tourist checking a shop's opening hours, someone asking an AI assistant for a dentist nearby. The detailed technical data is further down.

The Sedico economy online: businesses and their websites

How many businesses there are, in which sectors, and how many have a website that actually opens.

The 323 businesses we counted, by sector. The three largest: restaurants (10.2%), home and tech (9.9%), and beauty and wellness (7.7%).

The count comes from Overture Maps, an open dataset of places: these are the businesses a customer finds on a map, not the entries of the official business register.

Business types in the area
Share of the businesses counted
  • Restaurants10.2% (33)
  • Home and tech9.9% (32)
  • Beauty and wellness7.7% (25)
  • Industry6.5% (21)
  • Construction5.3% (17)
  • Bars and pubs5.0% (16)
  • Professional services5.0% (16)
  • Fashion and beauty5.0% (16)
  • Food shops5.0% (16)
  • Automotive4.3% (14)
  • Sport and fitness4.3% (14)
  • Other sectors31.9% (103)

Of 323 businesses, 195 (60.4%) list a website and 150 (46.4%) have one that works.

The other 45 that list a website send customers to an address that does not answer, or to a social profile, a booking site or a delivery platform instead of a website. Someone tapping the link on a map gets an error, or a page that is not the business's own.

The share of businesses with a working website is lower than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 54.3%.

Businesses with a website
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy

Of the 45 businesses that list a website we could not open, 20 (44.4%) point to a domain or server that does not answer, 9 (20%) list a social profile or a platform page instead of a website, 7 (15.6%) have a site whose bot protection stopped our tool, 5 (11.1%) fail to connect, on a network error or a timeout, and 4 (8.9%) open an error page.

A domain that does not answer has usually expired or lost its hosting; an error page is often the address of a site that was rebuilt or closed, left behind on the map. Among the profiles and platforms listed instead of a website, the most common is Linktree (3). The 7 businesses with a protected site are a separate case: the server answers with a bot check page (status 403 or 202), so the site most likely opens for someone visiting it in a browser, but we could not audit it. That is a limit of the tool, not a broken site: counting them, the businesses with a working website would rise to at most 157, 48.6%.

The share of links to a domain that does not answer is lower than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 47.5%.

Why the listed website does not open
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy

The bot protections recognised

  • SiteGround2 sites | 28.6%
  • Cloudflare1 sites | 14.3%
  • Not recognised4 sites | 57.1%

The share of businesses with a working website, sector by sector (sectors with at least 30 businesses). Best covered: home and tech, 68.8%. Least covered: restaurants, 45.5%.

A sector at the bottom of the list does not mean worse businesses: in some sectors customers book or order through a platform, and the business lists that instead of a website.

Against the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, 1 of 2 sectors is higher, 0 lower and 1 in line.

Websites by sector
  • Working website, above average
  • Working website, below average
  • Listed, not working
  • No website
  • Sedico average, every sector: 46.4%
  • Working website, average of 108 cities in Italy
Home and tech3268.8%21.8%9.4%67.2%
Restaurants3345.5%18.1%36.4%42.5%

Speed and ease of use, on a phone

How long someone opening the site on a phone waits, and whether they can use it with a screen reader too.

What people do while they wait, according to research
  • 53%

    of people on a phone leave a page that takes longer than 3 seconds to load.

  • +103%

    more visitors leave straight away with a delay of just 2 seconds.

  • 7%

    fewer enquiries and sales for every extra 100 milliseconds of waiting.

Sources: Google, Akamai. Research on user behavior, not measurements from this scan.

On the main page of 133 sites, the median scores are 66 out of 100 for performance (mean 65.6), 87 for accessibility (mean 86), 92 for best practices (mean 86.9), and 92 for SEO (mean 92.8).

Performance sits in the middle band (50 to 89): the page works, but on a phone with a slow mobile connection the wait is noticeable. Half the sites take more than 9.2 seconds to show their main content, the largest photo or block of text: above 4 seconds, the point where Google calls it poor. Accessibility needs work: many sites still have low contrast text, buttons without a name, or form fields a screen reader cannot read.

The median performance score is in line with the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 66.

Lighthouse scores of the home page
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy

Being found on Google

The basics that help Google find every page, show the right one, and read the business's details.

Of 142 working sites, 19% have no valid sitemap, 65.5% show no Search Console verification we can see, 35.2% have no meta description on the home page, and 26.8% do not state a canonical URL for the home page.

A sitemap is the list of pages a site hands to Google. Search Console is the free tool where the owner sees which searches the site appears for and whether Google finds errors. The meta description is the text under the title in search results: without one, Google picks its own. A canonical URL tells Google which version of a page to show when several copies exist.

The share of sites without a sitemap is lower than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 22.7%.

What working sites are missing
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy

5 of 150 businesses with a working website (3.3%) have complete basic structured data: a LocalBusiness block and a WebSite block, both complete.

Structured data is a block hidden in the page that tells Google the business's name, address, phone and opening hours without leaving it to guess. For the business's own details one block matters most, LocalBusiness: it tells Google the name, address, phone and opening hours without leaving it to guess. Of the 150 businesses with a working website, 12% have one and only 4% have it complete; those that have one most often leave out opening hours (61.1%).

The share of businesses with complete data is lower than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 3.7%.

Businesses with complete structured data (JSON-LD)
  • Yes, complete
  • No, incomplete or missing
Yes, complete3.3%3.7%
No, incomplete or missing96.7%96.3%
What is missing among those with the block
Opening hoursLocalBusiness61.1%11 of 18
AddressLocalBusiness16.7%3 of 18
TelephoneLocalBusiness16.7%3 of 18
URLLocalBusiness11.1%2 of 18
NameWebSite2.5%2 of 80

Being read by AI assistants

More and more people ask an AI assistant instead of searching Google. For general questions, such as a good restaurant downtown or a hairdresser open on Monday, assistants rely mostly on the ratings and the number of reviews a business has on Google and on review sites.

The website becomes decisive for specific questions (the menu, prices, a particular service, holiday opening hours) and to confirm the business exists and is the right one: that is why the assistant has to be able to read it. 98.6% of sites show their text without needing to run JavaScript, and 87.3% let AI assistants' crawlers in.

Across 142 working sites the AI Crawlability Score median is 79.6 out of 100 (mean 71.1): half the sites score at least 79.6, and the middle half sits between 64.2 and 85.

The score says how well an assistant such as ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini can read the site and tell what the business is: whether the text shows without running code, whether the site lets their crawlers in, whether there is structured data. The check with the lowest result is "ARD manifest for AI agents": only 0% of sites pass it.

The median score is in line with the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 78.3.

Median AI Crawlability Score
The score weighs ten checks: here is which ones, and how much each counts.
  • 78.3/100 Average of 108 cities in Italy
  • 79.6/100 Sedico

Trust: HTTPS and blocklisted servers

Trust plays out on two fronts. The first is visible: 12.7% of sites do not use HTTPS, and the browser writes "Not secure" next to the address, right where a customer is about to leave their name and phone number in a form.

The second is invisible, and it is about email. A server flagged for spam does the website no harm, which opens and shows up in search results as before; but email sent from that server can land in customers' spam folders and never be read.

We checked the server of every working site against three spam blocklists (Spamhaus, Barracuda and SpamCop). Of 142 sites with an answer, 1 (0.7%) sit on a blocklisted server: 1 servers out of 121.

A spam blocklist lists the addresses spam was sent from. It does the website no harm: the site opens and shows up on Google as before. The risk is email: if the business sends it from that server, confirmations, quotes and replies to customers can land in the spam folder and never be read. The server is often shared with many other sites, and the flag comes from one of them.

The share of sites on a blocklisted server is lower than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 1%.

Sites on spam blocklisted servers
Sedico
  • Blocklisted0.7%
  • Not blocklisted99.3%
  • No answer0%
1 blocklisted servers out of 121 checked
Average of 108 cities in Italy
  • Blocklisted1%
  • Not blocklisted97.9%
  • No answer1.1%
281 blocklisted servers out of 16,900 checked
// Your site

Try it on your site

The free audit runs the same checks as this report on your site: it reads the pages, measures the home page with Lighthouse, computes the AI Crawlability Score and tells you how it compares with the sites of your city. No sign up, up to 4 sites an hour.

  • SEO
  • Speed
  • Core Web Vitals
  • AI Crawlability Score
  • Compared with your city

Source: NFW Web Studio scan of 323 businesses, data updated on October 21, 2026.

// The technical detail

The same measurements, by their technical names

For developers: how the 142 working sites divide, not just their average. Here are the Core Web Vitals against Google's thresholds, JavaScript, image and font weight, file formats, technologies, what the structured data is made of, and the AI Crawlability Score's individual checks.

Performance, across 133 sites: half score below 66, one in four below 58, one in ten above 83. Median accessibility 87, SEO 92, AI Crawlability Score 79.6.

Each bar runs from the 10th to the 90th percentile; the thick part is the middle half of the sites, from the 25th to the 75th, and the mark is the median. A long bar means sites that differ a lot; a short one, sites that are alike.

The median performance score is in line with the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 66.

Lighthouse and AI Crawlability Scores: the spread
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy
PerformanceSedico505866748366
PerformanceAverage of 108 cities in Italy415566768965
AccessibilitySedico758287929686
AccessibilityAverage of 108 cities in Italy738188939686
Best practicesSedico69749210010087
Best practicesAverage of 108 cities in Italy69779610010087
SEOSedico85929210010093
SEOAverage of 108 cities in Italy83919210010092
AI Crawlability ScoreSedico40.564.279.68593.871.1
AI Crawlability ScoreAverage of 108 cities in Italy38.859.378.38594.669.6

Medians across 133 sites: first content (FCP) 2.7 s, main content (LCP) 9.2 s, page on screen (Speed Index) 5.3 s, blocking time (TBT) 82 ms, and server response (TTFB) 166 ms.

Against Google's thresholds, the median is good for TBT and TTFB, in need of improvement for FCP and Speed Index, and poor for LCP. These are lab measurements: Lighthouse simulates a mid-range phone on a slow mobile connection, so the times are longer than on an office computer. Interactivity (INP) cannot be measured in the lab.

The median main content time (LCP) is higher than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 7.3 s.

Home page load times: Core Web Vitals and Lighthouse
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy
  • Google's "good" threshold
First content on screen (FCP)Sedico1.7 s2.2 s2.7 s3.3 s4.0 s3.0 s
First content on screen (FCP)Average of 108 cities in Italy1.4 s2.0 s2.6 s3.4 s4.7 s3.0 s
Main content on screen (LCP)Sedico3.6 s5.0 s9.2 s15.5 s23.3 s12.1 s
Main content on screen (LCP)Average of 108 cities in Italy2.9 s4.5 s7.3 s12.8 s20.6 s10.5 s
Page on screen (Speed Index)Sedico2.6 s3.9 s5.3 s8.0 s10.6 s6.3 s
Page on screen (Speed Index)Average of 108 cities in Italy2.2 s3.2 s4.9 s7.5 s10.9 s6.0 s
Blocking time (TBT)Sedico0 ms30 ms82 ms217 ms438 ms167 ms
Blocking time (TBT)Average of 108 cities in Italy0 ms24 ms123 ms351 ms795 ms370 ms
Server response (TTFB)Sedico14 ms34 ms166 ms592 ms1.6 s542 ms
Server response (TTFB)Average of 108 cities in Italy14 ms30 ms97 ms488 ms1.2 s439 ms

JavaScript downloaded by the home page: median 649 kB, one site in ten above 1.4 MB. Layout shift (CLS): 75th percentile 0.01, 90th percentile 0.14.

JavaScript has to be downloaded and run by the phone before the page responds to taps: the heavier it is, the harder the phone works. Three sites in four stay within 0.10, Google's good threshold: content does not jump around while the page loads, but one site in ten goes above 0.14.

The median JavaScript weight is in line with the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 682 kB.

JavaScript weight and layout stability
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy
JavaScript downloadedSedico133 kB323 kB649 kB1.1 MB1.4 MB807 kB
JavaScript downloadedAverage of 108 cities in Italy112 kB321 kB682 kB1.2 MB1.9 MB875 kB
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy
  • Google's "good" threshold
Layout shift (CLS)Sedico0000.010.140.05
Layout shift (CLS)Average of 108 cities in Italy0000.020.160.06

Median weight per file: images 28 kB, fonts 33 kB, preview image (og:image) 188 kB. One image in ten is above 379 kB.

A photo of a few hundred kB makes sense full screen, not as a thumbnail: the heaviest files are what slow a page down on a phone. The scale is logarithmic: each tick is ten times the one before.

The median image weight is higher than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 23 kB.

File weight, by kind
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy
ImagesSedico604 B6 kB28 kB140 kB379 kB148 kB
ImagesAverage of 108 cities in Italy547 B3 kB23 kB100 kB294 kB135 kB
FontsSedico8 kB17 kB33 kB50 kB82 kB47 kB
FontsAverage of 108 cities in Italy9 kB16 kB32 kB48 kB85 kB47 kB
FaviconsSedico782 B1 kB4 kB10 kB20 kB12 kB
FaviconsAverage of 108 cities in Italy828 B1 kB4 kB11 kB22 kB14 kB
Preview image (og:image)Sedico27 kB86 kB188 kB364 kB712 kB295 kB
Preview image (og:image)Average of 108 cities in Italy15 kB44 kB112 kB282 kB679 kB315 kB
VideosSedico12.0 MB14.3 MB18.2 MB22.2 MB24.5 MB18.2 MB
VideosAverage of 108 cities in Italy40 kB1.1 MB4.9 MB15.4 MB39.3 MB15.0 MB

Of the 5,126 images found, 16.3% use a modern format (WebP or AVIF), 47.4% JPG and 20.2% PNG. Of the fonts, 85.1% are WOFF2.

At the same quality, WebP and AVIF are usually much lighter than JPG and PNG: the same photo reaches the phone sooner and uses less data.

The share of images in a modern format is lower than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 21.5%.

File formats
Images
  • JPG
  • PNG
  • WEBP
  • SVG
  • Other
JPG47.4%38.4%
PNG20.2%22.2%
WEBP15.4%17.5%
SVG10.4%12.2%
Other6.5%9.7%
Fonts
  • WOFF2
  • WOFF
  • TTF
  • Other
WOFF285.1%84.1%
WOFF10%9.1%
TTF4.8%5.7%
Other0.1%1.1%
Favicons
  • PNG
  • JPG
  • ICO
  • SVG
  • Other
PNG65.9%65%
JPG15%12.6%
ICO14.6%15.5%
SVG2.2%2.6%
Other2.2%4.4%
Preview image (og:image)
  • JPG
  • PNG
  • WEBP
  • SVG
  • Other
JPG74.2%64.5%
PNG13.6%23%
WEBP10%10.8%
SVG1.4%0.7%
Other0.9%1%
Videos
  • MP4
  • Other
MP4100%88%
Other0%12%

Across 138 working sites we recognized 305 different technologies. The most common: jQuery (69%), PHP (61.3%), and MySQL (50%). The most used CMS is WordPress, on 47.9% of sites.

Technologies are recognized with Wappalyzer on the main page only, after its JavaScript has run: a technology used only on inner pages can be missed. The filter above shows one category at a time.

The share of sites on WordPress is higher than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 40.7%.

Most used technologies
  • Sedico
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy
  1. 01
    jQueryJavaScript libraries
    69%
  2. 02
    PHPProgramming languages
    61.3%
  3. 03
    Open Graph
    54.9%
  4. 04
    MySQLDatabases
    50%
  5. 05
    WordPressCMS
    47.9%
  6. 06
    Google AnalyticsAnalytics
    47.2%
  7. 07
    Google Font APIFont scripts
    47.2%
  8. 08
    Google Tag ManagerTag managers
    47.2%
  9. 09
    jQuery MigrateJavaScript libraries
    46.5%
  10. 10
    Font AwesomeFont scripts
    41.5%
  11. 11
    HTTP/3
    40.8%
  12. 12
    RSS
    40.8%
jQuery69%62.9%
PHP61.3%49.6%
Open Graph54.9%57.7%
MySQL50%41.9%
WordPress47.9%40.7%
Google Analytics47.2%39.8%
Google Font API47.2%45%
Google Tag Manager47.2%42.5%
jQuery Migrate46.5%38.2%
Font Awesome41.5%37.7%
HTTP/340.8%40.7%
RSS40.8%36%
Priority Hints37.3%36.5%
core-js31.7%33.5%
Yoast SEO26.8%20.1%
jQuery UI23.2%23.1%
Apache HTTP Server22.5%17.5%
Contact Form 722.5%16.6%
Twitter Emoji (Twemoji)22.5%20%
Bootstrap20.4%20.2%
Nginx20.4%24.4%
Swiper20.4%18.8%
Masonry16.9%13.5%
Isotope16.2%10.7%
iubenda16.2%15.3%
GSAP15.5%14.8%
Modernizr15.5%9.1%
Slider Revolution14.1%8.6%
Elementor13.4%13.4%
Cloudflare12%19.5%
Google Maps11.3%8.8%
lit-element11.3%8%
lit-html11.3%8%
reCAPTCHA11.3%13.3%
Cart Functionality10.6%11.9%
Site Kit10.6%6.7%
Aruba.it9.9%12.7%
Facebook Pixel9.9%10.8%
LiteSpeed9.9%4.8%
Cookie Control7.7%6%
Lodash7.7%10.4%
PWA7.7%7.7%
PhotoSwipe7.7%3.3%
cdnjs7.7%5.3%
Cookiebot7%6.2%
Skrollr7%3.1%
wpBakery7%6.3%
Animate.css6.3%5.2%
Caddy6.3%n/a
CookieYes6.3%4.1%
FancyBox6.3%5.3%
Slick6.3%3.3%
Cybot5.6%4.9%
LazySizes5.6%6.1%
MediaElement.js5.6%4.4%
Usercentrics5.6%n/a
WhatsApp Business Chat5.6%4.2%
Complianz4.9%2.6%
Hello Elementor4.9%4.4%
Jetpack4.9%n/a
OWL Carousel4.9%6.2%
Plesk4.9%7.2%
React4.9%10.3%
Shopify4.9%3.5%
prettyPhoto4.9%3.8%
Bitmovin4.2%n/a
Divi4.2%2.8%
Matomo Analytics4.2%n/a
Popper4.2%4%
SnatchBot4.2%n/a
Unpkg4.2%2.1%
jsDelivr4.2%4.5%
Amazon Web Services3.5%5.8%
Cookie Notice3.5%n/a
Hammer.js3.5%n/a
Joomla3.5%n/a
Vimeo3.5%2.6%
WooCommerce3.5%6.2%
YouTube3.5%3.6%
anime.js3.5%n/a
jQuery CDN3.5%n/a
Astra2.8%n/a
Duda2.8%n/a
Google Hosted Libraries2.8%2.2%
Microsoft ASP.NET2.8%4.9%
MobX2.8%n/a
PayPal2.8%3.8%
Polylang2.8%n/a
RequireJS2.8%2.2%
Select22.8%3.5%
TablePress2.8%n/a
UIKit2.8%n/a
Underscore.js2.8%2.5%
WPML2.8%4.7%
AddToAny2.1%n/a
AddToAny Share Buttons2.1%n/a
Adobe Fonts2.1%2.3%
American Express2.1%n/a
Apple Pay2.1%2.7%
Backbone.js2.1%n/a

Of the 150 businesses with a working website, 62% have at least one JSON-LD block, but only 3.3% have complete basic data. The most common types on the sites are WebSite (53.5%), BreadcrumbList (40.1%), and WebPage (39.4%).

WebSite, WebPage and BreadcrumbList describe the site and its pages, and an SEO plugin often adds them on its own. To tell Google and AI assistants who the business is, where it is and when it is open, it takes a complete LocalBusiness block.

The share of businesses with complete basic data is lower than the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 3.7%.

Basic structured data (JSON-LD)

What we count as complete

A business has complete basic structured data when the pages of its site carry both of these JSON-LD blocks:

  • LocalBusiness or one of its subtypes (Restaurant, Dentist, Store, LegalService...), with name, a structured address (PostalAddress, not free text), telephone, URL and opening hours.
  • WebSite with the site's name and URL.

Each block can appear on any of the analyzed pages. A block missing even one of these counts as incomplete. Shares are of the businesses with a working website.

Sedico
58.7%
38%
  • Complete 3.3%
  • Some JSON-LD, basics incomplete 58.7%
  • No JSON-LD 38%
Average of 108 cities in Italy
55.9%
40.4%
  • Complete 3.7%
  • Some JSON-LD, basics incomplete 55.9%
  • No JSON-LD 40.4%
LocalBusinessComplete 4%
  • Complete 4%
  • Incomplete 8%
  • Missing 88%
Missing from LocalBusiness
  • Opening hours61.1%
  • Address16.7%
  • Telephone16.7%
  • URL11.1%
  • Name0%
WebSiteComplete 52%
  • Complete 52%
  • Incomplete 1.3%
  • Missing 46.7%
Missing from WebSite
  • Name2.5%
  • URL0%

Across 142 working sites, the check with the highest result is "Content visible without JavaScript" (98.6), the one with the lowest "ARD manifest for AI agents" (0). The robots.txt lets AI crawlers in on 87.3% of sites.

Each check has a weight, written under its name: a site's score is the weighted average of the checks that could be verified. A check the scan could not verify does not count as failed, and the site is judged on the others.

The share of sites open to AI crawlers is in line with the average of the 108 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 83.7%.

The AI Crawlability Score's checks
  • 98.6%
    Content visible without JavaScript
    weight 20
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 94.3%
  • 87.3%
    robots.txt open to AI crawlers
    weight 15
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 83.7%
  • 58.5%
    Structured data on the home page
    weight 15
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 56.6%
  • 81%
    Sitemap
    weight 10
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 77.3%
  • 20.4%
    llms.txt file
    weight 10
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 24.9%
  • 92.8%
    Lighthouse SEO score
    weight 5
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 91.9%
  • 91.5%
    Home page title
    weight 5
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 93.5%
  • 87.3%
    HTTPS
    weight 5
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 89.3%
  • 73.2%
    Home page canonical
    weight 5
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 73.2%
  • 64.8%
    Home page meta description
    weight 5
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 66.3%
  • 0%
    ARD manifest for AI agents
    weight 5
    Average of 108 cities in Italy: 0%
// Digging deeper

What else the working sites show

Cuts of the 142 working sites beyond the headline figures. A site counts once, only home pages are measured, and a group needs at least 10 sites to appear.

Sector by sector

Mean Lighthouse performance and AI Crawlability Score of the working sites of each sector with at least 10 sites. A site counts once, in the sector most of its businesses are in.

SectorSitesPerformanceAI Crawlability Score
Home and tech1967.970.4
Construction1665.973.2
Restaurants1572.158.1
Industry1362.273.2
Professional services126378.4

What the sites run on

Technologies detected on the home page of 138 of 142 working sites, with the mean scores of the sites that use each.

Technologies
TechnologySitesSharePerformanceAI Crawlability Score
jQuery9869%63.376.4
PHP8761.3%64.776
Open Graph7854.9%62.781.1
MySQL7150%63.879.2
WordPress6847.9%64.179.7
Google Analytics6747.2%61.478.2
Google Font API6747.2%62.775.8
Google Tag Manager6747.2%61.178.3
CDN
CDNSitesSharePerformanceAI Crawlability Score
None detected11178.2%66.471.8
google1611.3%70.167.1

Content basics

68.3% of the sites have at least one page that repeats a word above the density our crawler flags as keyword stuffing.

On the home page, 16.9% of titles are longer than 60 characters and 35.9% of the sites have no meta description. 14.8% repeat the same title on more than one page.

Security

87.3% of the sites answer on HTTPS, and 92.7% of those redirect plain HTTP to it.

Of 124 certificates checked, 100% are valid and 4.8% expire within 30 days.

Security headers on the home page: 21.1% send Strict-Transport-Security and 13.4% a Content-Security-Policy. We check that a header is present, not how strong it is.

// This scan

The Sedico scan, at a glance

Period
From October 16 to 21, 2026
Kind of scan
Quick: home page and first 4 sitemap pages; Lighthouse and technologies on the home page only
Area
City of Sedico
Businesses counted
323
Working sites analyzed
142
National comparison
Average of 108 cities scanned in Italy
Data updated
October 21, 2026
Overture Maps data
September 18, 2026
Scanner version
v1.2.0
How we measure: the full method
// Data and limits

Where the data comes from

The businesses and the website they list come from Overture Maps, an open dataset of places. We use no other source to find websites: every site analyzed is the one listed on the business's Overture entry.

Places have no single licence for the whole theme: each provider has its own, all permissive. CDLA Permissive 2.0 for Meta, Microsoft, PinMeTo, Krick, RenderSEO, DAC and BrightQuery, Apache 2.0 for Foursquare (whose data was transformed to Overture's schema) and CC0 1.0 for AllThePlaces.

Administrative boundaries (the divisions theme) are licensed ODbL and come from OpenStreetMap, geoBoundaries, Esri Community Maps and LINZ. That is why our reports carry the line Overture gives for data that includes OpenStreetMap.

Overture's page states no sharing or derived data obligations beyond that line: we add no conditions that are not there, and refer to each source's own licence for the details.

Attribution
© OpenStreetMap contributors, Overture Maps Foundation

What this scan read

  • Overture dataset of September 18, 2026.
  • 44 of the 186 sites we tried to analyze did not answer or blocked our tool (23.7%): the web figures cover the other 142.
  • AI Crawlability Score computed with rules 2.0.0. It is our own measure, not an industry standard.

What these figures do and do not measure

A report says precise things, and only those. These are the limits to keep in mind when quoting one of its figures.

  • Homepage only. Lighthouse and the AI Crawlability Score measure each site's main page, not the whole site: the figure is that of a shop window, not of every page.
  • Working sites only. The web figures cover the sites that answer. Sites that do not answer, or that block our tool, are left out: a site behind a bot check can be unmeasurable while working for a visitor.
  • Only businesses that list a website on Overture. A business with no website on its listing is not measured on the web, and a listing with an old website leads to a page that does not open. Every report says how many businesses list a website and how many have a working one.
  • A sample, not a register. Overture is not the business register: it covers some businesses and some areas better than others, so the picture can lean towards businesses with a well kept listing.
  • A site counts once. When several businesses list the same site, it counts once in the web figures. Business counts count each one.
  • One language. Our tool presents itself as an Italian browser: a multilingual site is measured in its Italian version.
  • Search Console is recognised only from a meta tag or the DNS, so the real share can be higher than the one we show.
  • The AI Crawlability Score is our own measure, not a market standard: it cannot be compared with outside tools. It changes with rules versions, and two reports compare only on the same scanner and the same rules.
  • Cities only, and only averages and medians. Reports do not say who is best in a sector or which studios do better, and they publish no single business's result.
// frequently asked questions

The answers, to your questions.

We counted 323 businesses in Sedico. 195 of them (60.4%) list a website, but only 150 (46.4%) have one that works: the other addresses do not answer, or lead to a social profile or a booking site. The scan ran from October 16 to 21, 2026.
The Sedico scan does not have enough businesses yet to compare sectors.
If it is based in Sedico and appears on Overture Maps, probably yes. We do not publish results for single businesses or single sites, here or in the open data. If you want to see yours, book the free 30 minute call: we show you how it came out of the scan, meaning speed, SEO, AI readability and technologies, and what we would fix first. Or run the free SEO audit on your site right away: the same checks as this report, compared with the sites of your city.
The things this report finds missing most often are also the cheapest to fix: connecting Search Console, writing a meta description for the home page, having a valid sitemap, adding a complete LocalBusiness block with opening hours, converting images to WebP or AVIF, and adding a preview image for shares. For general searches, ratings and reviews matter most: keeping the Google listing up to date is worth as much as the website. The free SEO audit shows you in a few minutes which of these your site is missing; on the free call we go through them together.
The figures are free to use, commercial use included, as long as you cite the source (CC BY 4.0 license). Cite NFW Web Studio, the page title and its link, for example: NFW Web Studio, "Sedico businesses, October 2026", https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/sedico-city-october-2026-v1-2-0. The aggregate figures are also available as JSON at https://dashboard.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/v1/scans/c4d1b249-dd7c-46bd-80f2-66d80f94216b. If you need a figure that is not here, write to us.
A landing page starts from €520 and a full website from €1,160, VAT included. These are starting prices: after a call, you get a written quote with a single figure within 24 hours. A landing page takes under 7 days, a full website starts from 7 days. With the express option, timelines are halved and guaranteed: online within 48 hours for a landing page and 96 hours for a full website.
Yes to both. We are based in Verona, and when it makes sense we come and see the shop, workshop or venue: understanding the space helps us describe it on the site. We also work remotely with businesses across Italy and Europe, with the same method and timelines: only the way we meet changes, a video call instead of a coffee.
You can, and to get started it may be enough. Before you choose, check the things this report measures on every site: how long it takes to open on a phone, whether it has a sitemap, whether it describes the business in a way Google and AI assistants can read. Some free builders cover them, some do not, and some do not let you change them. To check them you can use the free SEO audit; if you like, we can look at what you built together on the free call.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Contact us

// ready when you are

Your website, online within a week.

Write to us today: we reply within 24 hours with the next steps.

  • Meet in person or by video call
  • Written quote within 24 hours
  • Published prices, VAT included
  • Online within a week
  • The site stays yours
Contact for Sedico
Enrico: Software Engineer
enrico@nfw.run
Available for in-person meetings in San Giovanni Lupatoto and Verona, and by video call across Italy and Europe.