NFW Web Studio
News
// AI readability, San Bonifacio

Generative engine optimization in San Bonifacio: getting cited by AI

AI assistants cite the sites they can read. In San Bonifacio the average AI readability score is 68.3 out of 100, under the national average of 69.6. The technical base holds: most sites serve their content without JavaScript. What is missing are the signals that tell an AI who you are and what you do. NFW Web Studio works on those points, from the llms.txt file to structured data, for businesses in the eastern Verona area and across Italy and Europe.

68.3
mean readability index, out of 100
11 points
under the 2.0.0 rules
llms.txt
on fewer than one site in four

Why does generative engine optimization matter for a San Bonifacio business?

A person who asks an AI assistant for a supplier or a tradesperson gets three or four names, not a list of ten links. A business those systems cannot read does not make it into the answer, however good its work is.

Firms that sell to other firms get technical questions. Where a buyer wants a supplier, a data sheet or a quote, the assistant's answer carries real weight.

  • An llms.txt file that sums up who you are and what you offer.
  • Business data, address and opening hours, in structured form.
  • A robots.txt that does not shut the door on AI crawlers.
  • Pages that say what they do, without depending on JavaScript.

What would making San Bonifacio's site readable by AI take?

Part of the work is technical and takes little time; part is text and data. Together they cost a fraction of what an agency asks for the same result, and they can be done on the site you already have. The method and the starting points are on the AI search optimization service page.

Our own site, measured on the same score

The score we use for San Bonifacio is the one we run on our own site: its points are explained one by one on the method page.

How much an AI can read of San Bonifacio's sites

The score has eleven points with different weights, under the 2.0.0 rules. We computed it across the town's working sites.

average score, out of 100
68.3
Median 74.8: half the sites sit above it, half below.
sites carrying an llms.txt file
22.5%
A ten point item that few sites have yet: 87 of 386 carry one.
sites publishing an ARD manifest
0%
The newest five point item: no site measured declares one yet.
sites with structured data
56.7%
A fifteen point item, and the one that most separates a described site from a silent one.

Taken from the AI readability score in the report on San Bonifacio's web, using the 2.0.0 rules over 386 sites.

The figures come from Overture Maps listings: many businesses are not mapped or do not list a website, so the shares describe the listings, not every business in the town. How we read the data.

Which points of the score matter most in San Bonifacio?

Serving content without JavaScript and letting AI crawlers in are the heavy points, and most sites pass them. The light points decide who gets quoted.

The site reads well, but does not introduce itself

Readable without JavaScript: 94.4%; robots.txt open to AI: 80.6%; HTTPS 86%; sitemap 75.6%; structured data 56.7%; llms.txt 22.5%; ARD manifest 0%.

A page a machine can read but cannot place stays a name in a list. Structured data and llms.txt are a few hours of work that move the score, with no new site needed.

Points of the AI score in San Bonifacio
  • San Bonifacio
  • Average of 108 cities in Italy
Content visible without JavaScript94.4%94.3%
robots.txt open to AI crawlers80.6%83.7%
Structured data on the home page56.7%56.6%
llms.txt file22.5%24.9%
Sitemap75.6%77.3%
ARD manifest for AI agents0%0%
Home page canonical72.8%73.2%
HTTPS86.3%89.3%
Lighthouse SEO score92.7%91.9%
Home page meta description64.8%66.3%
Home page title93.3%93.5%

San Bonifacio's typical AI score against a site of ours

The same score, the same points: the San Bonifacio column comes from the report, ours from the sites we measured.

What we measureThe typical San Bonifacio siteAn NFW Web Studio site
The llms.txt file for AI22.5% of sitesAvailable, with the key pages in markdown
ARD manifest on the site0% of sitesPublished on our own site
Structured data present56.7% of sitesAlways, with LocalBusiness and hours
robots.txt and AI crawlers80.6% of sitesAlways, one line per crawler
Average AI readability score68.3 out of 100Checked with the same tool, on our pages

The score is our own measure, not an industry standard: its points are explained one by one on the AI Crawlability Score method.

Questions on AI visibility in San Bonifacio

It is a score of eleven points, from 0 to 100, that measures how well an AI assistant can read and understand a site. We wrote it, it is not an industry standard, and each point is explained on the method page.
No, and we do not promise it. The score says whether the site is readable, not whether an assistant uses it. What can be improved, we improve; the rest depends on Google, on the assistants and on rivals.
It is not mandatory, but it lets you describe in a few lines who you are and what you offer. In San Bonifacio fewer than one site in four has one, so it is one of the simplest ways to stand out.
Usually not: existing sites improve on structured data, descriptions, robots.txt and readable pages. A new site starts with those points already in order.

Let's see what an AI can read on your site.

Half an hour on the score point by point, and what we would change, in person in the eastern Verona area or by video call. Then a written proposal.