We counted almost 350 Eraclea businesses and checked their websites in October 2026. Of these, just over 200 list a website, but about 6 businesses in 10 have no working website.
Want to know where your site sits among these numbers?Run the free SEO audit
Here the numbers are told the way people using these sites experience them: a customer looking for a restaurant on their phone, a tourist checking a shop's opening hours, someone asking an AI assistant for a dentist nearby. The detailed technical data is further down.
How many businesses there are, in which sectors, and how many have a website that actually opens.
The 348 businesses we counted, by sector. The three largest: restaurants (19%), lodging (8.9%), and beauty and wellness (7.2%).
The count comes from Overture Maps, an open dataset of places: these are the businesses a customer finds on a map, not the entries of the official business register.
Of 348 businesses, 210 (60.3%) list a website and 142 (40.8%) have one that works.
The other 68 that list a website send customers to an address that does not answer, or to a social profile, a booking site or a delivery platform instead of a website. Someone tapping the link on a map gets an error, or a page that is not the business's own.
The share of businesses with a working website is lower than the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 53%.
Of the 68 businesses that list a website we could not open, 28 (41.2%) point to a domain or server that does not answer, 14 (20.6%) open an error page, 9 (13.2%) list a social profile or a platform page instead of a website, 9 (13.2%) have a site whose bot protection stopped our tool, and 8 (11.8%) fail to connect, on a network error or a timeout.
A domain that does not answer has usually expired or lost its hosting; an error page is often the address of a site that was rebuilt or closed, left behind on the map. Among the profiles and platforms listed instead of a website, the most common is Instagram (4). The 9 businesses with a protected site are a separate case: the server answers with a bot check page (status 403 or 202), so the site most likely opens for someone visiting it in a browser, but we could not audit it. That is a limit of the tool, not a broken site: counting them, the businesses with a working website would rise to at most 151, 43.4%.
The share of links to a domain that does not answer is lower than the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 46.9%.
The share of businesses with a working website, sector by sector (sectors with at least 30 businesses). Best covered: lodging, 74.2%. Least covered: restaurants, 28.8%.
A sector at the bottom of the list does not mean worse businesses: in some sectors customers book or order through a platform, and the business lists that instead of a website.
Against the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, 1 of 2 sectors is higher, 1 lower and 0 in line.
| Lodging | 31 | 74.2% | 3.2% | 22.6% | 57.2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restaurants | 66 | 28.8% | 22.7% | 48.5% | 40.9% |
How long someone opening the site on a phone waits, and whether they can use it with a screen reader too.
of people on a phone leave a page that takes longer than 3 seconds to load.
more visitors leave straight away with a delay of just 2 seconds.
fewer enquiries and sales for every extra 100 milliseconds of waiting.
Sources: Google, Akamai. Research on user behavior, not measurements from this scan.
On the main page of 121 sites, the median scores are 67 out of 100 for performance (mean 64.1), 88 for accessibility (mean 85.8), 88 for best practices (mean 84.1), and 92 for SEO (mean 91.7).
Performance sits in the middle band (50 to 89): the page works, but on a phone with a slow mobile connection the wait is noticeable. Half the sites take more than 7.0 seconds to show their main content, the largest photo or block of text: above 4 seconds, the point where Google calls it poor. Accessibility needs work: many sites still have low contrast text, buttons without a name, or form fields a screen reader cannot read.
The median performance score is in line with the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 66.
The basics that help Google find every page, show the right one, and read the business's details.
Of 134 working sites, 29.1% have no valid sitemap, 68.9% show no Search Console verification we can see, 41.8% have no meta description on the home page, and 35.8% do not state a canonical URL for the home page.
A sitemap is the list of pages a site hands to Google. Search Console is the free tool where the owner sees which searches the site appears for and whether Google finds errors. The meta description is the text under the title in search results: without one, Google picks its own. A canonical URL tells Google which version of a page to show when several copies exist.
The share of sites without a sitemap is higher than the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 22.8%.
5 of 142 businesses with a working website (3.5%) have complete basic structured data: a LocalBusiness block and a WebSite block, both complete.
Structured data is a block hidden in the page that tells Google the business's name, address, phone and opening hours without leaving it to guess. For the business's own details one block matters most, LocalBusiness: it tells Google the name, address, phone and opening hours without leaving it to guess. Of the 142 businesses with a working website, 12% have one and only 3.5% have it complete; those that have one most often leave out opening hours (41.2%).
The share of businesses with complete data is in line with the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 3.6%.
| Yes, complete | 3.5% | 3.6% |
|---|---|---|
| No, incomplete or missing | 96.5% | 96.4% |
| Opening hours | LocalBusiness | 41.2% | 7 of 17 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telephone | LocalBusiness | 35.3% | 6 of 17 |
| Address | LocalBusiness | 23.5% | 4 of 17 |
| URL | LocalBusiness | 11.8% | 2 of 17 |
More and more people ask an AI assistant instead of searching Google. For general questions, such as a good restaurant downtown or a hairdresser open on Monday, assistants rely mostly on the ratings and the number of reviews a business has on Google and on review sites.
The website becomes decisive for specific questions (the menu, prices, a particular service, holiday opening hours) and to confirm the business exists and is the right one: that is why the assistant has to be able to read it. 92.7% of sites show their text without needing to run JavaScript, and 80.6% let AI assistants' crawlers in.
Across 134 working sites the AI Crawlability Score median is 65 out of 100 (mean 64): half the sites score at least 65, and the middle half sits between 52.6 and 84.6.
The score says how well an assistant such as ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini can read the site and tell what the business is: whether the text shows without running code, whether the site lets their crawlers in, whether there is structured data. The check with the lowest result is "ARD manifest for AI agents": only 0% of sites pass it.
The median score is lower than the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 75.6.
The four ways a visitor most often has to reach the business, as a share of the working sites measured. Each figure carries its own base, because the contact, form and channel checks do not cover exactly the same sites.
Trust plays out on two fronts. The first is visible: 15.7% of sites do not use HTTPS, and the browser writes "Not secure" next to the address, right where a customer is about to leave their name and phone number in a form.
The second is invisible, and it is about email. A server flagged for spam does the website no harm, which opens and shows up in search results as before; but email sent from that server can land in customers' spam folders and never be read.
We checked the server of every working site against three spam blocklists (Spamhaus, Barracuda and SpamCop). Of 131 sites with an answer, 4 (3.1%) sit on a blocklisted server: 3 servers out of 117.
A spam blocklist lists the addresses spam was sent from. It does the website no harm: the site opens and shows up on Google as before. The risk is email: if the business sends it from that server, confirmations, quotes and replies to customers can land in the spam folder and never be read. The server is often shared with many other sites, and the flag comes from one of them.
The share of sites on a blocklisted server is higher than the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 1%.
The free audit runs the same checks as this report on your site: it reads the pages, measures the home page with Lighthouse, computes the AI Crawlability Score and tells you how it compares with the sites of your city. No sign up, up to 4 sites an hour.
Source: NFW Web Studio scan of 348 businesses, data updated on October 26, 2026.
For developers: how the 134 working sites divide, not just their average. Here are the Core Web Vitals against Google's thresholds, JavaScript, image and font weight, file formats, technologies, what the structured data is made of, and the AI Crawlability Score's individual checks.
Performance, across 121 sites: half score below 67, one in four below 52, one in ten above 89. Median accessibility 88, SEO 92, AI Crawlability Score 65.
Each bar runs from the 10th to the 90th percentile; the thick part is the middle half of the sites, from the 25th to the 75th, and the mark is the median. A long bar means sites that differ a lot; a short one, sites that are alike.
The median performance score is in line with the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 66.
| Performance | Eraclea | 36 | 52 | 67 | 76 | 89 | 64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 41 | 55 | 66 | 76 | 89 | 65 |
| Accessibility | Eraclea | 76 | 80 | 88 | 91 | 96 | 86 |
| Accessibility | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 73 | 81 | 88 | 93 | 96 | 86 |
| Best practices | Eraclea | 65 | 73 | 88 | 100 | 100 | 84 |
| Best practices | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 69 | 77 | 96 | 100 | 100 | 87 |
| SEO | Eraclea | 82 | 91 | 92 | 100 | 100 | 92 |
| SEO | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 83 | 91 | 92 | 100 | 100 | 92 |
| AI Crawlability Score | Eraclea | 32.9 | 52.6 | 65 | 84.6 | 91.8 | 64 |
| AI Crawlability Score | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 38.7 | 59.3 | 75.6 | 85 | 94.6 | 69.4 |
Medians across 121 sites: first content (FCP) 2.6 s, main content (LCP) 7.0 s, page on screen (Speed Index) 4.8 s, blocking time (TBT) 122 ms, and server response (TTFB) 158 ms.
Against Google's thresholds, the median is good for TBT and TTFB, in need of improvement for FCP and Speed Index, and poor for LCP. These are lab measurements: Lighthouse simulates a mid-range phone on a slow mobile connection, so the times are longer than on an office computer. Interactivity (INP) cannot be measured in the lab.
The median main content time (LCP) is lower than the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 7.3 s.
| First content on screen (FCP) | Eraclea | 1.4 s | 1.9 s | 2.6 s | 4.1 s | 5.7 s | 3.2 s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First content on screen (FCP) | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 1.4 s | 2.0 s | 2.6 s | 3.4 s | 4.7 s | 3.0 s |
| Main content on screen (LCP) | Eraclea | 3.3 s | 4.7 s | 7.0 s | 11.3 s | 19.3 s | 9.4 s |
| Main content on screen (LCP) | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 2.9 s | 4.5 s | 7.3 s | 12.8 s | 20.7 s | 10.6 s |
| Page on screen (Speed Index) | Eraclea | 2.1 s | 3.2 s | 4.8 s | 7.8 s | 11.5 s | 6.1 s |
| Page on screen (Speed Index) | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 2.2 s | 3.2 s | 4.9 s | 7.4 s | 10.8 s | 6.0 s |
| Blocking time (TBT) | Eraclea | 0 ms | 29 ms | 122 ms | 248 ms | 1.1 s | 372 ms |
| Blocking time (TBT) | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 0 ms | 24 ms | 124 ms | 348 ms | 784 ms | 365 ms |
| Server response (TTFB) | Eraclea | 20 ms | 32 ms | 158 ms | 581 ms | 1.6 s | 476 ms |
| Server response (TTFB) | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 14 ms | 30 ms | 99 ms | 495 ms | 1.2 s | 444 ms |
JavaScript downloaded by the home page: median 662 kB, one site in ten above 1.8 MB. Layout shift (CLS): 75th percentile 0.01, 90th percentile 0.20.
JavaScript has to be downloaded and run by the phone before the page responds to taps: the heavier it is, the harder the phone works. Three sites in four stay within 0.10, Google's good threshold: content does not jump around while the page loads, but one site in ten goes above 0.20.
The median JavaScript weight is in line with the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 679 kB.
| JavaScript downloaded | Eraclea | 76 kB | 347 kB | 662 kB | 1.1 MB | 1.8 MB | 860 kB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JavaScript downloaded | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 111 kB | 319 kB | 679 kB | 1.2 MB | 1.9 MB | 871 kB |
| Layout shift (CLS) | Eraclea | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.06 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Layout shift (CLS) | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.06 |
Median weight per file: images 34 kB, fonts 34 kB, preview image (og:image) 102 kB. One image in ten is above 340 kB.
A photo of a few hundred kB makes sense full screen, not as a thumbnail: the heaviest files are what slow a page down on a phone. The scale is logarithmic: each tick is ten times the one before.
The median image weight is higher than the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 24 kB.
| Images | Eraclea | 516 B | 3 kB | 34 kB | 138 kB | 340 kB | 134 kB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Images | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 552 B | 4 kB | 24 kB | 102 kB | 297 kB | 135 kB |
| Fonts | Eraclea | 10 kB | 18 kB | 34 kB | 48 kB | 91 kB | 45 kB |
| Fonts | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 9 kB | 16 kB | 32 kB | 49 kB | 85 kB | 48 kB |
| Favicons | Eraclea | 947 B | 1 kB | 4 kB | 12 kB | 27 kB | 12 kB |
| Favicons | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 832 B | 1 kB | 4 kB | 11 kB | 23 kB | 14 kB |
| Preview image (og:image) | Eraclea | 9 kB | 47 kB | 102 kB | 376 kB | 899 kB | 310 kB |
| Preview image (og:image) | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 15 kB | 45 kB | 113 kB | 283 kB | 682 kB | 317 kB |
| Videos | Eraclea | 48 kB | 3.7 MB | 5.2 MB | 25.9 MB | 50.8 MB | 18.5 MB |
| Videos | Average of 150 cities in Italy | 40 kB | 1.1 MB | 4.9 MB | 15.5 MB | 38.8 MB | 14.9 MB |
Of the 4,213 images found, 13.2% use a modern format (WebP or AVIF), 44.1% JPG and 25.4% PNG. Of the fonts, 84.1% are WOFF2.
At the same quality, WebP and AVIF are usually much lighter than JPG and PNG: the same photo reaches the phone sooner and uses less data.
The share of images in a modern format is lower than the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 20.9%.
| JPG | 44.1% | 39.2% |
|---|---|---|
| PNG | 25.4% | 22.3% |
| SVG | 11.7% | 12% |
| WEBP | 10.5% | 17% |
| Other | 8.3% | 9.6% |
| WOFF2 | 84.1% | 83.9% |
|---|---|---|
| WOFF | 11% | 9.3% |
| TTF | 4.1% | 5.8% |
| OTF | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Other | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| PNG | 65.5% | 65.2% |
|---|---|---|
| ICO | 17.5% | 15.2% |
| JPG | 9.4% | 12.6% |
| WEBP | 4% | 3.7% |
| Other | 3.6% | 3.2% |
| JPG | 60.3% | 64.8% |
|---|---|---|
| PNG | 19% | 22.7% |
| WEBP | 17.5% | 10.8% |
| GIF | 1.6% | 0.3% |
| Other | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| MP4 | 88.9% | 88.1% |
|---|---|---|
| MOV | 11.1% | 3% |
| Other | 0% | 8.9% |
Across 128 working sites we recognized 273 different technologies. The most common: jQuery (59.7%), PHP (58.2%), and jQuery Migrate (46.3%). The most used CMS is WordPress, on 45.5% of sites.
Technologies are recognized with Wappalyzer on the main page only, after its JavaScript has run: a technology used only on inner pages can be missed. The filter above shows one category at a time.
The share of sites on WordPress is higher than the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 41.3%.
| jQuery | 59.7% | 63.6% |
|---|---|---|
| PHP | 58.2% | 50.6% |
| jQuery Migrate | 46.3% | 38.8% |
| MySQL | 45.5% | 42.6% |
| WordPress | 45.5% | 41.3% |
| Open Graph | 44% | 57.7% |
| Google Font API | 43.3% | 45.6% |
| RSS | 42.5% | 36.3% |
| HTTP/3 | 41% | 40.9% |
| Google Analytics | 39.6% | 40.5% |
| Google Tag Manager | 37.3% | 43% |
| Font Awesome | 35.8% | 38.2% |
| Priority Hints | 32.8% | 36.6% |
| core-js | 29.9% | 33.4% |
| Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) | 27.6% | 20.3% |
| Contact Form 7 | 24.6% | 16.9% |
| Nginx | 23.9% | 24.3% |
| jQuery UI | 23.9% | 23.4% |
| Bootstrap | 22.4% | 20.8% |
| Google Maps | 19.4% | 9.5% |
| Yoast SEO | 17.2% | 20.1% |
| reCAPTCHA | 17.2% | 13.4% |
| Apache HTTP Server | 15.7% | 17.5% |
| Aruba.it | 15.7% | 12.8% |
| Swiper | 14.2% | 18.9% |
| iubenda | 14.2% | 15.4% |
| Cloudflare | 13.4% | 19.5% |
| Elementor | 13.4% | 13.6% |
| Masonry | 13.4% | 13.6% |
| Modernizr | 13.4% | 9.4% |
| Slider Revolution | 13.4% | 8.9% |
| GSAP | 12.7% | 14.8% |
| WPML | 11.9% | 4.9% |
| Isotope | 11.2% | 10.8% |
| lit-element | 11.2% | 8% |
| lit-html | 11.2% | 8% |
| Slick | 10.4% | 3.7% |
| Cart Functionality | 9.7% | 11.8% |
| PWA | 8.2% | 7.6% |
| Animate.css | 7.5% | 5.3% |
| Facebook Pixel | 7.5% | 10.8% |
| Cookie Script | 6.7% | n/a |
| Hello Elementor | 6.7% | 4.5% |
| React | 6.7% | 10.2% |
| Site Kit | 6.7% | 6.7% |
| wpBakery | 6.7% | 6.4% |
| Joomla | 6% | n/a |
| LazySizes | 6% | 6.1% |
| Lodash | 6% | 10% |
| RankMath SEO | 6% | 3.8% |
| Underscore.js | 6% | 2.8% |
| FancyBox | 5.2% | 5.4% |
| OWL Carousel | 5.2% | 6.6% |
| Vue.js | 5.2% | 3.3% |
| WooCommerce | 5.2% | 6.2% |
| cdnjs | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| Caddy | 4.5% | n/a |
| CookieYes | 4.5% | 4.5% |
| Cookiebot | 4.5% | 6.3% |
| Facebook Login | 4.5% | 3% |
| Google Hosted Libraries | 4.5% | 2.6% |
| Lightbox | 4.5% | 2.3% |
| MediaElement.js | 4.5% | 4.4% |
| Moment.js | 4.5% | 3.1% |
| Plesk | 4.5% | 7.2% |
| Sentry | 4.5% | 5% |
| Cloudflare Bot Management | 3.7% | n/a |
| Cookie Control | 3.7% | 6% |
| Cybot | 3.7% | 5% |
| Divi | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| IIS | 3.7% | 4.2% |
| Microsoft ASP.NET | 3.7% | 4.9% |
| Onsen UI | 3.7% | n/a |
| Select2 | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Stripe | 3.7% | n/a |
| Windows Server | 3.7% | 4.2% |
| jQuery CDN | 3.7% | n/a |
| prettyPhoto | 3.7% | 3.8% |
| Amazon Web Services | 3% | 5.7% |
| Complianz | 3% | 2.7% |
| DreamWeaver | 3% | n/a |
| Google Ads | 3% | 2.5% |
| Java | 3% | n/a |
| LiteSpeed | 3% | 4.9% |
| OneTrust | 3% | n/a |
| PixelYourSite | 3% | n/a |
| Polylang | 3% | n/a |
| Redux Framework | 3% | n/a |
| Smash Balloon Instagram Feed | 3% | n/a |
| Store Vantage | 3% | n/a |
| TablePress | 3% | n/a |
| Tailwind CSS | 3% | 4.3% |
| WhatsApp Business Chat | 3% | 4.3% |
| Wix | 3% | 3.5% |
| jsDelivr | 3% | 4.6% |
| Adobe Client Data Layer | 2.2% | n/a |
| Adobe Experience Manager | 2.2% | n/a |
| Adobe Experience Platform Launch | 2.2% | n/a |
| All in One SEO Pack | 2.2% | n/a |
| Angular | 2.2% | n/a |
Of the 142 businesses with a working website, 49.3% have at least one JSON-LD block, but only 3.5% have complete basic data. The most common types on the sites are WebSite (39.6%), WebPage (34.3%), and BreadcrumbList (32.8%).
WebSite, WebPage and BreadcrumbList describe the site and its pages, and an SEO plugin often adds them on its own. To tell Google and AI assistants who the business is, where it is and when it is open, it takes a complete LocalBusiness block.
The share of businesses with complete basic data is in line with the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 3.6%.
A business has complete basic structured data when the pages of its site carry both of these JSON-LD blocks:
LocalBusiness or one of its subtypes (Restaurant, Dentist, Store, LegalService...), with name, a structured address (PostalAddress, not free text), telephone, URL and opening hours.WebSite with the site's name and URL.Each block can appear on any of the analyzed pages. A block missing even one of these counts as incomplete. Shares are of the businesses with a working website.
LocalBusinessComplete 3.5%WebSiteComplete 40.1%Across 134 working sites, the check with the highest result is "Content visible without JavaScript" (92.7), the one with the lowest "ARD manifest for AI agents" (0). The robots.txt lets AI crawlers in on 80.6% of sites.
Each check has a weight, written under its name: a site's score is the weighted average of the checks that could be verified. A check the scan could not verify does not count as failed, and the site is judged on the others.
The share of sites open to AI crawlers is in line with the average of the 150 cities in Italy we have scanned so far, which is 83.5%.
Cuts of the 134 working sites beyond the headline figures. A site counts once, only home pages are measured, and a group needs at least 10 sites to appear.
Mean Lighthouse performance and AI Crawlability Score of the working sites of each sector with at least 10 sites. A site counts once, in the sector most of its businesses are in.
| Lodging | 21 | 60 | 76.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Restaurants | 19 | 62.3 | 57.7 |
| Construction | 14 | 64.7 | 68 |
| Industry | 12 | 55.4 | 57.7 |
Technologies detected on the home page of 128 of 134 working sites, with the mean scores of the sites that use each.
| jQuery | 80 | 59.7% | 61.9 | 70.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHP | 78 | 58.2% | 63.8 | 69 |
| jQuery Migrate | 62 | 46.3% | 61 | 73.4 |
| MySQL | 61 | 45.5% | 62 | 73.9 |
| WordPress | 61 | 45.5% | 62 | 73.9 |
| Open Graph | 59 | 44% | 58.2 | 80 |
| Google Font API | 58 | 43.3% | 58.9 | 70.8 |
| RSS | 57 | 42.5% | 62.1 | 71.2 |
| None detected | 100 | 74.6% | 64.5 | 61 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 8.2% | 59.4 | 72 |
44% of the sites show a cookie consent platform, and 58.2% run an analytics tool. Of those that run analytics, 41% show no consent platform we could detect.
Most common: Iubenda (17.2%), Cookie Script (8.2%), Complianz (7.5%).
Detected from what the home page loads: a site may use a tool we do not see, so read these as a floor.
68.4% of the sites have at least one page that repeats a word above the density our crawler flags as keyword stuffing.
On the home page, 26.1% of titles are longer than 60 characters and 41.8% of the sites have no meta description. 14.3% repeat the same title on more than one page.
84.3% of the sites answer on HTTPS, and 91.2% of those redirect plain HTTP to it.
Of 113 certificates checked, 100% are valid and 4.4% expire within 30 days.
Security headers on the home page: 17.9% send Strict-Transport-Security and 10.4% a Content-Security-Policy. We check that a header is present, not how strong it is.
What a visitor can use to reach the business: phone, email, forms and the messaging, social and review channels. Each part states its base once, and every figure is written next to its bar.
"Shown" means on screen or inside a collapsed menu, not that it exists somewhere in the code. The counts cover every page we audited on a site, up to 5, not only the home page.
The desktop and mobile shares are small and comparable only within one scan. We never publish or keep a phone number, an email address or a profile name from this data.
Of 122 sites measured. "Desktop only" means shown on desktop and missing on mobile, "mobile only" the reverse, of the sites that have that contact.
Shares of the sites that show a phone number. The types overlap: a site can show a mobile and a landline.
Shares of the sites that show an email address.
Of the sites whose listing (Overture Maps) has that contact, the share that also shows it on the site.
Of 122 sites measured. We look at the forms and never submit them: the destination of each gets one plain request, nothing is sent.
Shares of the sites with a contact form.
Shares of the sites with a contact form.
Of 121 sites checked.
"Desktop only" and "mobile only" are shares of the sites measured on both renders.
A site shows 2 channels on average.
The businesses and the website they list come from Overture Maps, an open dataset of places. We use no other source to find websites: every site analyzed is the one listed on the business's Overture entry.
Places have no single licence for the whole theme: each provider has its own, all permissive. CDLA Permissive 2.0 for Meta, Microsoft, PinMeTo, Krick, RenderSEO, DAC and BrightQuery, Apache 2.0 for Foursquare (whose data was transformed to Overture's schema) and CC0 1.0 for AllThePlaces.
Administrative boundaries (the divisions theme) are licensed ODbL and come from OpenStreetMap, geoBoundaries, Esri Community Maps and LINZ. That is why our reports carry the line Overture gives for data that includes OpenStreetMap.
Overture's page states no sharing or derived data obligations beyond that line: we add no conditions that are not there, and refer to each source's own licence for the details.
Attribution
© OpenStreetMap contributors, Overture Maps Foundation
A report says precise things, and only those. These are the limits to keep in mind when quoting one of its figures.
We are NFW Web Studio, a web studio based in Verona, working with businesses and professionals in Eraclea and across Italy and Europe. If your site is one of the slow ones on a phone, has no sitemap, or does not describe the business in a way Google can read, that can be fixed: a landing page starts from €520 and a full website from €1,160, VAT included.
Web design services for businessesWe rebuild your site from what you already have, and fix what this report measures: speed on a phone, sitemap, business details for Google and AI assistants. From €320 for a landing page.
Learn moreSearch Console, sitemap, canonical URLs and a LocalBusiness block: the items in this report that decide whether Google finds you. From €320 one time, or €550 a month for ongoing SEO.
Learn moreIt started as a landing page and grew into a full website with a page for every town: from 6 to 40 Google clicks in 42 days, and the first call from the Business Profile in month three.
Read the caseDidn't find what you were looking for? Contact us
Write to us today: we reply within 24 hours with the next steps.