NFW Web Studio
News
// State of the web, October 2026
v1.1.0

Pescantina businesses: how many have a website, and how well it works

We counted almost 500 Pescantina businesses and checked their websites in October 2026. Of these, just over 350 list a website, but more than one business in two has no working website.

477 businesses shown of 477 mapped in Pescantina
Map generated from Overture Maps data of September 18, 2026.
// At a glance

The numbers to remember

have a working website
49%
of almost 500 businesses counted
The rest, just over 250, have no website, or list one that does not open: an address that does not answer, a social profile.
to show the main content, on a phone
6.8 s
median of just over 200 sites, mean 9.4 s
More than three sites in four take longer than 4 seconds, the point Google calls poor. Past 3 seconds, 53% of people on a phone leave the page.
describe themselves to Google in full (structured data)
4%
of almost 250 businesses with a working website
Name, address, phone, website and opening hours in a block Google and AI assistants read without guessing.
have a valid sitemap
78%
of just over 230 working sites
23% of sites do not hand Google the list of their pages, which it uses to find them all.
median AI score, out of 100
80
across just over 230 working sites, mean 71.4
How well ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini can read and cite the site; half the sites score above it, half below. For general searches, reviews and ratings count as much.

Want to know where your site sits among these numbers?Run the free SEO audit

// The report in plain words

What a customer finds when looking for a business in Pescantina

Here the numbers are told the way people using these sites experience them: a customer looking for a restaurant on their phone, a tourist checking a shop's opening hours, someone asking an AI assistant for a dentist nearby. The detailed technical data is further down.

The Pescantina economy online: businesses and their websites

How many businesses there are, in which sectors, and how many have a website that actually opens.

The 489 businesses we counted, by sector. The three largest: industry (9%), restaurants (8.8%), and construction (8.8%).

The count comes from Overture Maps, an open dataset of places: these are the businesses a customer finds on a map, not the entries of the official business register.

Business types in the area
Share of the businesses counted
  • Industry9.0% (44)
  • Restaurants8.8% (43)
  • Construction8.8% (43)
  • Beauty and wellness7.0% (34)
  • Home and tech6.1% (30)
  • Bars and pubs5.3% (26)
  • Sport and fitness5.1% (25)
  • Lodging5.1% (25)
  • Automotive4.9% (24)
  • Health4.3% (21)
  • Creative and media4.1% (20)
  • Other sectors31.5% (154)

Of 489 businesses, 355 (72.6%) list a website and 238 (48.7%) have one that works.

The other 117 that list a website send customers to an address that does not answer, or to a social profile, a booking site or a delivery platform instead of a website. Someone tapping the link on a map gets an error, or a page that is not the business's own.

Businesses with a website

Of the 117 businesses that list a website we could not open, 61 (52.1%) point to a domain or server that does not answer, 21 (17.9%) have a site whose bot protection stopped our tool, 17 (14.5%) list a social profile or a platform page instead of a website, 14 (12%) open an error page, and 4 (3.4%) fail to connect, on a network error or a timeout.

A domain that does not answer has usually expired or lost its hosting; an error page is often the address of a site that was rebuilt or closed, left behind on the map. Among the profiles and platforms listed instead of a website, the most common is Instagram (8). The 21 businesses with a protected site are a separate case: the server answers with a bot check page (status 202 or 403), so the site most likely opens for someone visiting it in a browser, but we could not audit it. That is a limit of the tool, not a broken site: counting them, the businesses with a working website would rise to at most 259, 53%.

Why the listed website does not open

The bot protections recognised

  • SiteGround10 sites | 52.6%
  • Cloudflare3 sites | 15.8%
  • DataDome1 sites | 5.3%
  • Not recognised5 sites | 26.3%

The share of businesses with a working website, sector by sector (sectors with at least 30 businesses). Best covered: home and tech, 73.3%. Least covered: beauty and wellness, 23.5%.

A sector at the bottom of the list does not mean worse businesses: in some sectors customers book or order through a platform, and the business lists that instead of a website.

Websites by sector
  • Working website, above average
  • Working website, below average
  • Listed, not working
  • No website
  • Pescantina average, every sector: 48.7%
Home and tech3073.3%16.7%10%
Industry4465.9%15.9%18.2%
Construction4365.1%14%20.9%
Restaurants4341.9%30.2%27.9%
Beauty and wellness3423.5%29.4%47.1%

Speed and ease of use, on a phone

How long someone opening the site on a phone waits, and whether they can use it with a screen reader too.

What people do while they wait, according to research
  • 53%

    of people on a phone leave a page that takes longer than 3 seconds to load.

  • +103%

    more visitors leave straight away with a delay of just 2 seconds.

  • 7%

    fewer enquiries and sales for every extra 100 milliseconds of waiting.

Sources: Google, Akamai. Research on user behavior, not measurements from this scan.

On the main page of 219 sites, the median scores are 69 out of 100 for performance (mean 68.1), 89 for accessibility (mean 86.2), 96 for best practices (mean 88.5), and 92 for SEO (mean 91.8).

Performance sits in the middle band (50 to 89): the page works, but on a phone with a slow mobile connection the wait is noticeable. Half the sites take more than 6.8 seconds to show their main content, the largest photo or block of text: above 4 seconds, the point where Google calls it poor. Accessibility needs work: many sites still have low contrast text, buttons without a name, or form fields a screen reader cannot read.

Lighthouse scores of the home page

Being found on Google

The basics that help Google find every page, show the right one, and read the business's details.

Of 231 working sites, 22.5% have no valid sitemap, 60.6% show no Search Console verification we can see, 34.2% have no meta description on the home page, and 28.6% do not state a canonical URL for the home page.

A sitemap is the list of pages a site hands to Google. Search Console is the free tool where the owner sees which searches the site appears for and whether Google finds errors. The meta description is the text under the title in search results: without one, Google picks its own. A canonical URL tells Google which version of a page to show when several copies exist.

What working sites are missing

10 of 238 businesses with a working website (4.2%) have complete basic structured data: a LocalBusiness block and a WebSite block, both complete.

Structured data is a block hidden in the page that tells Google the business's name, address, phone and opening hours without leaving it to guess. For the business's own details one block matters most, LocalBusiness: it tells Google the name, address, phone and opening hours without leaving it to guess. Of the 238 businesses with a working website, 15.1% have one and only 5.9% have it complete; those that have one most often leave out opening hours (47.2%).

Businesses with complete structured data (JSON-LD)
  • Yes, complete
  • No, incomplete or missing
Yes, complete4.2%
No, incomplete or missing95.8%
What is missing among those with the block
Opening hoursLocalBusiness47.2%17 of 36
TelephoneLocalBusiness25%9 of 36
AddressLocalBusiness19.4%7 of 36
URLLocalBusiness13.9%5 of 36
NameWebSite1.7%2 of 117

Being read by AI assistants

More and more people ask an AI assistant instead of searching Google. For general questions, such as a good restaurant downtown or a hairdresser open on Monday, assistants rely mostly on the ratings and the number of reviews a business has on Google and on review sites.

The website becomes decisive for specific questions (the menu, prices, a particular service, holiday opening hours) and to confirm the business exists and is the right one: that is why the assistant has to be able to read it. 97% of sites show their text without needing to run JavaScript, and 85.3% let AI assistants' crawlers in.

Across 231 working sites the AI score median is 79.6 out of 100 (mean 71.4): half the sites score at least 79.6, and the middle half sits between 59.3 and 85.

The score says how well an assistant such as ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini can read the site and tell what the business is: whether the text shows without running code, whether the site lets their crawlers in, whether there is structured data. The check with the lowest result is "llms.txt file": only 26% of sites pass it.

Median AI score
The score weighs ten checks: here is which ones, and how much each counts.
  • 79.6/100 Pescantina

Trust: HTTPS and blocklisted servers

Trust plays out on two fronts. The first is visible: 11.3% of sites do not use HTTPS, and the browser writes "Not secure" next to the address, right where a customer is about to leave their name and phone number in a form.

The second is invisible, and it is about email. A server flagged for spam does the website no harm, which opens and shows up in search results as before; but email sent from that server can land in customers' spam folders and never be read.

We checked the server of every working site against three spam blocklists (Spamhaus, Barracuda and SpamCop). Of 228 sites with an answer, 1 (0.4%) sit on a blocklisted server: 1 servers out of 192.

A spam blocklist lists the addresses spam was sent from. It does the website no harm: the site opens and shows up on Google as before. The risk is email: if the business sends it from that server, confirmations, quotes and replies to customers can land in the spam folder and never be read. The server is often shared with many other sites, and the flag comes from one of them.

Sites on spam blocklisted servers
Pescantina
  • Blocklisted0.4%
  • Not blocklisted98.3%
  • No answer1.3%
1 blocklisted servers out of 192 checked
// Your site

Try it on your site

The free audit runs the same checks as this report on your site: it reads the pages, measures the home page with Lighthouse, computes the AI score and tells you how it compares with the sites of your city. No sign up, up to 5 sites an hour.

  • SEO
  • Speed
  • Core Web Vitals
  • AI score
  • Compared with your city

Source: NFW Web Studio scan of 489 businesses, data updated on October 1, 2026.

// The technical detail

The same measurements, by their technical names

For developers: how the 231 working sites divide, not just their average. Here are the Core Web Vitals against Google's thresholds, JavaScript, image and font weight, file formats, technologies, what the structured data is made of, and the AI score's individual checks.

Performance, across 219 sites: half score below 69, one in four below 59, one in ten above 89. Median accessibility 89, SEO 92, AI score 79.6.

Each bar runs from the 10th to the 90th percentile; the thick part is the middle half of the sites, from the 25th to the 75th, and the mark is the median. A long bar means sites that differ a lot; a short one, sites that are alike.

Lighthouse and AI scores: the spread
  • Pescantina
PerformancePescantina485969788968
AccessibilityPescantina738189939586
Best practicesPescantina73779610010088
SEOPescantina83929210010092
AI scorePescantina39.659.379.68599.671.4

Medians across 219 sites: first content (FCP) 2.4 s, main content (LCP) 6.8 s, page on screen (Speed Index) 4.4 s, blocking time (TBT) 92 ms, and server response (TTFB) 67 ms.

Against Google's thresholds, the median is good for TBT and TTFB, in need of improvement for FCP and Speed Index, and poor for LCP. These are lab measurements: Lighthouse simulates a mid-range phone on a slow mobile connection, so the times are longer than on an office computer. Interactivity (INP) cannot be measured in the lab.

Home page load times: Core Web Vitals and Lighthouse
  • Pescantina
  • Google's "good" threshold
First content on screen (FCP)Pescantina1.4 s1.9 s2.4 s3.1 s4.2 s2.8 s
Main content on screen (LCP)Pescantina2.8 s4.4 s6.8 s11.4 s18.9 s9.4 s
Page on screen (Speed Index)Pescantina2.1 s3.0 s4.4 s6.3 s10.0 s5.4 s
Blocking time (TBT)Pescantina0 ms7 ms92 ms243 ms660 ms214 ms
Server response (TTFB)Pescantina13 ms30 ms67 ms371 ms1.2 s433 ms

JavaScript downloaded by the home page: median 522 kB, one site in ten above 1.5 MB. Layout shift (CLS): 75th percentile 0.01, 90th percentile 0.15.

JavaScript has to be downloaded and run by the phone before the page responds to taps: the heavier it is, the harder the phone works. Three sites in four stay within 0.10, Google's good threshold: content does not jump around while the page loads, but one site in ten goes above 0.15.

JavaScript weight and layout stability
  • Pescantina
JavaScript downloadedPescantina116 kB262 kB522 kB955 kB1.5 MB703 kB
  • Pescantina
  • Google's "good" threshold
Layout shift (CLS)Pescantina0000.010.150.05

Median weight per file: images 23 kB, fonts 31 kB, preview image (og:image) 121 kB. One image in ten is above 308 kB.

A photo of a few hundred kB makes sense full screen, not as a thumbnail: the heaviest files are what slow a page down on a phone. The scale is logarithmic: each tick is ten times the one before.

File weight, by kind
  • Pescantina
ImagesPescantina547 B4 kB23 kB107 kB308 kB140 kB
FontsPescantina8 kB16 kB31 kB50 kB79 kB49 kB
FaviconsPescantina943 B1 kB4 kB11 kB17 kB12 kB
Preview image (og:image)Pescantina13 kB45 kB121 kB279 kB701 kB264 kB
VideosPescantina53 kB2.2 MB4.8 MB13.1 MB25.0 MB17.3 MB
AudioPescantina49 kB94 kB168 kB765 kB1.1 MB516 kB

Of the 7,477 images found, 20.8% use a modern format (WebP or AVIF), 39.4% JPG and 22.5% PNG. Of the fonts, 76.4% are WOFF2.

At the same quality, WebP and AVIF are usually much lighter than JPG and PNG: the same photo reaches the phone sooner and uses less data.

File formats
Images
  • JPG
  • PNG
  • WEBP
  • SVG
  • Other
JPG39.4%
PNG22.5%
WEBP17.9%
SVG11.4%
Other8.7%
Fonts
  • WOFF2
  • WOFF
  • TTF
  • L
  • Other
WOFF276.4%
WOFF7%
TTF5%
L4.7%
Other6.9%
Favicons
  • PNG
  • ICO
  • JPG
  • SVG
  • Other
PNG65.1%
ICO14.8%
JPG12.3%
SVG4.1%
Other3.6%
Preview image (og:image)
  • JPG
  • PNG
  • WEBP
  • GIF
  • Other
JPG58.4%
PNG29.2%
WEBP10.5%
GIF1%
Other1%
Videos
  • MP4
  • 4
  • V
  • WEBM
  • Other
MP482.6%
48.7%
V4.3%
WEBM4.3%
Other0%
Audio
  • MP3
  • WAV
  • Other
MP366.7%
WAV33.3%
Other0%

Across 228 working sites we recognized 315 different technologies. The most common: jQuery (69.7%), PHP (50.2%), and Google Font API (46.3%). The most used CMS is WordPress, on 42% of sites.

Technologies are recognized with Wappalyzer on the main page only, after its JavaScript has run: a technology used only on inner pages can be missed. The filter above shows one category at a time.

Most used technologies
  1. 01
    jQueryJavaScript libraries
    69.7%
  2. 02
    Open Graph
    59.3%
  3. 03
    PHPProgramming languages
    50.2%
  4. 04
    HTTP/3
    46.8%
  5. 05
    Google Font APIFont scripts
    46.3%
  6. 06
    RSS
    43.3%
  7. 07
    MySQLDatabases
    42.4%
  8. 08
    jQuery MigrateJavaScript libraries
    42.4%
  9. 09
    WordPressBlogs
    42%
  10. 10
    Font AwesomeFont scripts
    39.8%
  11. 11
    Priority HintsPerformance
    39.4%
  12. 12
    Google Tag ManagerTag managers
    37.2%
jQuery69.7%
Open Graph59.3%
PHP50.2%
HTTP/346.8%
Google Font API46.3%
RSS43.3%
MySQL42.4%
jQuery Migrate42.4%
WordPress42%
Font Awesome39.8%
Priority Hints39.4%
Google Tag Manager37.2%
Google Analytics34.6%
core-js33.8%
jQuery UI26.8%
Twitter Emoji (Twemoji)25.1%
Nginx22.5%
Bootstrap21.2%
Yoast SEO21.2%
Cloudflare18.6%
Aruba.it18.2%
Swiper18.2%
iubenda18.2%
GSAP17.3%
Apache HTTP Server16%
Elementor15.2%
Masonry14.3%
Contact Form 713.4%
Isotope12.6%
Cart Functionality10.8%
PWA10.4%
Lodash10%
reCAPTCHA9.5%
Facebook Pixel9.1%
Modernizr8.7%
Plesk8.2%
Animate.css7.8%
Site Kit7.8%
React7.4%
WooCommerce7.4%
lit-html7.4%
LiteSpeed6.9%
Slider Revolution6.9%
lit-element6.9%
wpBakery6.9%
OWL Carousel6.5%
Cookie Control6.1%
Cookiebot6.1%
FancyBox6.1%
Hello Elementor5.6%
cdnjs5.6%
Google Maps5.2%
jsDelivr5.2%
Astra4.8%
Cybot4.8%
Microsoft ASP.NET4.8%
Complianz4.3%
RankMath SEO4.3%
WPML4.3%
All in One SEO Pack3.9%
Google Ads3.9%
PayPal3.9%
Shopify3.9%
WhatsApp Business Chat3.9%
IIS3.5%
LazySizes3.5%
MediaElement.js3.5%
Select23.5%
Sentry3.5%
Skrollr3.5%
Windows Server3.5%
prettyPhoto3.5%
Apple Pay3%
Flickity3%
Vimeo3%
anime.js3%
AOS2.6%
Adobe Fonts2.6%
Elementor Header & Footer Builder2.6%
Facebook Login2.6%
Google Ads Conversion Tracking2.6%
Leaflet2.6%
Lenis2.6%
Livefyre2.6%
Matomo Analytics2.6%
Moment.js2.6%
Popper2.6%
RequireJS2.6%
Tailwind CSS2.6%
YouTube2.6%
particles.js2.6%
AdRoll2.2%
American Express2.2%
Divi2.2%
Google AdSense2.2%
Google Call Conversion Tracking2.2%
Google Pay2.2%
Gutenberg2.2%
Hostinger2.2%
Java2.2%

Of the 238 businesses with a working website, 57.6% have at least one JSON-LD block, but only 4.2% have complete basic data. The most common types on the sites are WebSite (48.1%), Organization (39%), and WebPage (38.1%).

WebSite, WebPage and BreadcrumbList describe the site and its pages, and an SEO plugin often adds them on its own. To tell Google and AI assistants who the business is, where it is and when it is open, it takes a complete LocalBusiness block.

Basic structured data (JSON-LD)

What we count as complete

A business has complete basic structured data when the pages of its site carry both of these JSON-LD blocks:

  • LocalBusiness or one of its subtypes (Restaurant, Dentist, Store, LegalService...), with name, a structured address (PostalAddress, not free text), telephone, URL and opening hours.
  • WebSite with the site's name and URL.

Each block can appear on any of the analyzed pages. A block missing even one of these counts as incomplete. Shares are of the businesses with a working website.

53.4%
42.4%
  • Complete 4.2%
  • Some JSON-LD, basics incomplete 53.4%
  • No JSON-LD 42.4%
LocalBusinessComplete 5.9%
  • Complete 5.9%
  • Incomplete 9.2%
  • Missing 84.9%
Missing from LocalBusiness
  • Opening hours47.2%
  • Telephone25%
  • Address19.4%
  • URL13.9%
  • Name0%
WebSiteComplete 48.3%
  • Complete 48.3%
  • Incomplete 0.8%
  • Missing 50.8%
Missing from WebSite
  • Name1.7%
  • URL0%

Across 231 working sites, the check with the highest result is "Content visible without JavaScript" (97), the one with the lowest "llms.txt file" (26). The robots.txt lets AI crawlers in on 85.3% of sites.

Each check has a weight, written under its name: a site's score is the weighted average of the checks that could be verified. A check the scan could not verify does not count as failed, and the site is judged on the others.

The AI score's checks
  • 97%
    Content visible without JavaScript
    weight 20
  • 85.3%
    robots.txt open to AI crawlers
    weight 15
  • 54.5%
    Structured data on the home page
    weight 15
  • 26%
    llms.txt file
    weight 15
  • 77.5%
    Sitemap
    weight 10
  • 95.2%
    Home page title
    weight 5
  • 91.8%
    Lighthouse SEO score
    weight 5
  • 88.7%
    HTTPS
    weight 5
  • 71.4%
    Home page canonical
    weight 5
  • 65.8%
    Home page meta description
    weight 5
// This scan

The Pescantina scan, at a glance

Period
On October 1, 2026
Kind of scan
Quick: home page and first 4 sitemap pages; Lighthouse and technologies on the home page only
Area
City of Pescantina
Businesses counted
489
Working sites analyzed
231
National comparison
Not yet: it takes at least two cities in Italy scanned on the same scanner version
Data updated
October 1, 2026
Overture Maps data
September 18, 2026
Scanner version
v1.1.0
How we measure: the full method
// frequently asked questions

The answers, to your questions.

We counted 489 businesses in Pescantina. 355 of them (72.6%) list a website, but only 238 (48.7%) have one that works: the other addresses do not answer, or lead to a social profile or a booking site. The scan ran on October 1, 2026.
Among the sectors with at least 30 businesses, the fewest working websites are in beauty and wellness (23.5%), restaurants (41.9%), and construction (65.1%); the most are in home and tech (73.3%), industry (65.9%), and construction (65.1%). The shares are the sector's businesses with a website that opens.
If it is based in Pescantina and appears on Overture Maps, probably yes. We do not publish results for single businesses or single sites, here or in the open data. If you want to see yours, book the free 30 minute call: we show you how it came out of the scan, meaning speed, SEO, AI readability and technologies, and what we would fix first. Or run the free SEO audit on your site right away: the same checks as this report, compared with the sites of your city.
The things this report finds missing most often are also the cheapest to fix: connecting Search Console, writing a meta description for the home page, having a valid sitemap, adding a complete LocalBusiness block with opening hours, converting images to WebP or AVIF, and adding a preview image for shares. For general searches, ratings and reviews matter most: keeping the Google listing up to date is worth as much as the website. The free SEO audit shows you in a few minutes which of these your site is missing; on the free call we go through them together.
The figures are free to use, commercial use included, as long as you cite the source (CC BY 4.0 license). Cite NFW Web Studio, the page title and its link, for example: NFW Web Studio, "Pescantina businesses: state of the web, October 2026", https://www.nfw.run/state-of-the-web/pescantina-city-october-2026-v1-1-0. The aggregate figures are also available as JSON at https://dashboard.nfw.run/v1/scans/052d63db-f473-4cd7-bcdc-2fbce6126631. If you need a figure that is not here, write to us.
A landing page starts from €520 and a full website from €1,160, VAT included. These are starting prices: after a call, you get a written quote with a single figure within 24 hours. A landing page takes under 7 days, a full website starts from 7 days. With the express option, timelines are halved and guaranteed: online within 48 hours for a landing page and 96 hours for a full website.
Yes to both. We are based in Verona, and when it makes sense we come and see the shop, workshop or venue: understanding the space helps us describe it on the site. We also work remotely with businesses across Italy and Europe, with the same method and timelines: only the way we meet changes, a video call instead of a coffee.
You can, and to get started it may be enough. Before you choose, check the things this report measures on every site: how long it takes to open on a phone, whether it has a sitemap, whether it describes the business in a way Google and AI assistants can read. Some free builders cover them, some do not, and some do not let you change them. To check them you can use the free SEO audit; if you like, we can look at what you built together on the free call.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Contact us

// ready when you are

Your website, online within a week.

Write to us today: we reply within 24 hours with the next steps.

  • Meet in person or by video call
  • Written quote within 24 hours
  • Published prices, VAT included
  • Online within a week
  • The site stays yours
Contact for Pescantina
Enrico: Software Engineer
enrico@nfw.run
Available for in-person meetings in San Giovanni Lupatoto and Verona, and by video call across Italy and Europe.